Is There a Connection Between Time and Size in Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter capcom1983
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
capcom1983
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Is there a correlation between time and size? Say there was a being the size of a planet (our observer) would our time on Earth seem to pass quicker to the observer or would it be the same?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Light travels at about 1 foot per nanosecond. You could do an experiment on a six-foot lab bench and measure the time it takes for light to travel the length of the bench and back as 12 nanoseconds. If you were six feet tall, would that have any bearing on your measurement?

Now if your nerves carried signals at the speed of light and your brain could process information really fast, you might have a hard time walking because there would be a 12 nanosecond delay between your eyes and brain telling your foot to avoid that hole in the ground and you seeing your foot reacting. So your huge observer would have similar issues but keep in mind that gravity would collapse any such being into a near-perfect sphere, just like planets are so it's really something that is impossible to happen.
 
Thanks
 
Code:
Say there was a being the size of a planet (our observer) would our time on Earth seem to pass quicker to the observer or would it be the same?

There is a correlation [from general relativity] between gravitational potential and the passage of time. For example, time appears to pass more slowly on our sun than on earth.

There is also another correlation between relative speeds [from special relativity].
 
Thanks as well I'm new to physics (at 30) as my major was in psychology and minor anatomy so any help would be great
 
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top