Is There a Faster Way to Find Conjugacy Classes in Group Theory?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter catcherintherye
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classes
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on efficient methods for finding conjugacy classes in group theory, specifically for the dihedral group D_6. The user describes their current method involving manual calculations of conjugates and seeks a faster alternative. A recommended tool for automating this process is GAP, which can compute conjugacy classes directly. Additionally, the discussion highlights theorems related to the order of groups and their conjugacy classes, which can provide insights into the structure of the group.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, specifically conjugacy classes.
  • Familiarity with the dihedral group D_6 and its presentation.
  • Knowledge of GAP (Groups, Algorithms, Programming) software.
  • Basic understanding of modular arithmetic in the context of group orders.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the capabilities of GAP for computing conjugacy classes in various groups.
  • Study theorems related to group orders and their implications on conjugacy classes.
  • Learn about the dihedral group and its properties in more detail.
  • Investigate other computational tools for group theory, such as Magma or SageMath.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, group theorists, and students studying algebra who are looking to optimize their methods for finding conjugacy classes in groups.

catcherintherye
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if anyone knows a more efficient method of finding conjugacy classes than the one i am currently using.
tex/ Example D_6* =<x,y| x^3=1, y^4=1, yx=x^2y>

now to find the conjugacy classes of this group i would first write out
the orbit of x <x> ={ 1x1, xxx^2, x^2xx, yxy^3,...x^2y^2xy^2x^2,...etc}

then i would use the set relation yx=(x^2)y to work out each of these 12 conjugates individually. Once this is done i continue with <x^2>, <y> etc...

..the only short cut i have found is the theorem that says <x>intersection<y> = empty set or <x>=<y>. But even with this surely there is a quicker way??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

In terms of finding the conjugacy classes, there doesn't look to be a faster way. I mean, if you actually wanted to know what they are, how would you get them without doing the calculations? If you don't want to do them by hand, I recommend GAP: http://www-gap.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/
It will compute conjugacy classes for you.

There are some other theorems that might save you some time. For example, if G has odd order g, and if h is the number of conjugacy classes of G, then g = h (mod 16). Once you have computed most of the classes, this will probably tell you if the rest of the elements form a single conjugacy class or not. There is another variant of this theorem which says that if all of the primes dividing g are congruent to 1 (mod m), then g = h (mod 2m^2).
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-9890(199505)102%3A5<440%3ACRTOOA>2.0.CO%3B2-%23
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
20K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K