Is There a Limit to Technological Progress in the Field of Science?

AI Thread Summary
Quantum computers are expected to eventually function as anticipated, but the broader implications of technological progress raise questions about the limits of human imagination and the role of science in defining what is possible. While some believe that advancements could lead to a scenario where nearly anything imaginable becomes achievable, this perspective overlooks the constraints imposed by the laws of nature. The discussion suggests that as technology evolves, the focus may shift towards the ethical and moral implications of its use, rather than merely the capabilities it offers. The notion of an "enough technological progress" is debated, with some arguing that the pursuit of knowledge and innovation will continue indefinitely, driven by human curiosity and imagination. However, any predictions about future advancements must be grounded in scientific principles, such as the second law of thermodynamics. The conversation also touches on the idea that future technologies could pose existential risks, prompting a shift in concern from immediate threats to more cosmic considerations.
Hippasos
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Quantum computers will someday function and give results we expect them to give or not.

Does the progress of science ultimately lead us to the situation that almost everything humanly imaginable becomes possible through technology? Would that situation be called "enough technological progress" - and then what?
Will it become more and more only matter of beliefs and moral values of a community how to utilize the knowledge?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
It's like saying when we have a unlimited supply of water we will never fell thirsty again. Humans are limited by physical conditions, we only see in some spectrum, hear in another, and our brain in another, but i guess we will always be thirsty for more and more knowledge, or to perfect what was made.
 
Hippasos said:
Quantum computers will someday function and give results we expect them to give or not.
Huh?
Does the progress of science ultimately lead us to the situation that almost everything humanly imaginable becomes possible through technology?
Certainly not - that would require the suspension of the laws of the natural world. Science is what tells us what is not possible! (ie, travel faster than the speed of light).
Would that situation be called "enough technological progress" - and then what?
Huh?
Will it become more and more only matter of beliefs and moral values of a community how to utilize the knowledge?
Huh?

That is a very rambling and largely incoherent post... perhaps you could try again?
 
The exponential, unstoppable, advance of technology is a common fantasy.

See Kurzweil's Singularity, Tipler's Omega Point, McKenna's timewave, de Chardin's Noosphere.

But no predictions should be taken seriously unless they are models properly grounded in the second law of thermodynamics.
/
 
I think tech and science will progress as long as we have imagination to continue.

I firmly believe that if we get to the point where we are actually hindered by the speed of light we will find a way around it. I don't think anything is truly impossible. We just don't know how to do it yet.

I wonder how long until we stop worrying about how some new tech will end the world and instead worry about how some new tech will end the galaxy/universe. : )
 
Thread 'ChatGPT Examples, Good and Bad'
I've been experimenting with ChatGPT. Some results are good, some very very bad. I think examples can help expose the properties of this AI. Maybe you can post some of your favorite examples and tell us what they reveal about the properties of this AI. (I had problems with copy/paste of text and formatting, so I'm posting my examples as screen shots. That is a promising start. :smile: But then I provided values V=1, R1=1, R2=2, R3=3 and asked for the value of I. At first, it said...
Sorry if 'Profile Badge' is not the correct term. I have an MS 365 subscription and I've noticed on my Word documents the small circle with my initials in it is sometimes different in colour document to document (it's the circle at the top right of the doc, that, when you hover over it it tells you you're signed in; if you click on it you get a bit more info). Last night I had four docs with a red circle, one with blue. When I closed the blue and opened it again it was red. Today I have 3...
Back
Top