I Is there a limit to the possible masses of particles in the universe?

Silviu
Messages
612
Reaction score
11
Hello! I read that, according to quantum mechanics, any physical process must happen with a certain probability if it is not forbidden by symmetry/conservation laws. And now I just started an internship at the CMS aiming to find a Higgs like particle with mass higher that 125 GeV. And we have Monte Carlo simulations of the signal of this particle at different masses. My question is, as we are able to simulate the signal, it means we have some theory predicting a certain Higgs mass which means that all these simulated masses are possible to be achieved (as they can be modeled theoretical I assume there is nothing to prevent their existence). So I was wondering, is there anything that would prevent the existence of a particle at any mass? Like taking a random mass (300 GeV for example) does it mean that there is a particle in the universe having that mass?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are mixing two different things of "possible" here.

The first one is "possible according to the laws of nature". If a process is possible, it has a non-zero probability. That is basically the definition of "possible".

The second one is "this could be a law of nature - we don't know, it is possible". The universe follows some laws which we do not know fully today. But it only follows a single set of fundamental laws (by definition).
There could be a particle type with a mass of 300 GeV - we don't know. But either there is, or there is not, and it is just a matter of our knowledge.
 
  • Like
Likes QuantumQuest and vanhees71
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top