Is there a more beginner-friendly book to learn General Relativity?

AliAhmed
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this topic, but I need some opinions.

I would really love to learn General Relativity. I possesses a working knowledge of tensors (namely tensor calculus and analysis).

Upon doing some research I was told Gravitation by Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler is one of the best books out there however I've also read that it is not ideal for beginners. Is there any other book that would be ideal for me.

Also, is it necessary to know Special Relativity before learning General Relativity? If so, can someone recommend a good book (my mathematics skills are very advanced).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Special relativity isn't difficult. The first few chapters in Schutz go over it in enough detail that, with your math background, you should be able pick it up immediately. Schutz is a good book for beginners, though you're probably ready for something a little more advanced.

My recommendation is Carroll with Wald as a reference.
 
elfmotat said:
Special relativity isn't difficult. The first few chapters in Schutz go over it in enough detail that, with your math background, you should be able pick it up immediately. Schutz is a good book for beginners, though you're probably ready for something a little more advanced.

My recommendation is Carroll with Wald as a reference.
This looks like a very good recommendation. I really like Schutz for the chapters about SR, but i'd prefer something else for GR. I like Wald better than Schutz for the GR, but I think it's a bit too hard for most people. I don't know anything about Carroll, but it has a really high rating at Amazon.

I also recommend the books by John M. Lee for differential geometry. (The ones with "smooth manifolds" and "Riemannian manifolds" in their titles).

Edit: I didn't see this:
Ali said:
(my mathematics skills are very advanced).
If this is the case, then Wald is definitely an option. If you have the mathematical maturity, the only problem is that it doesn't really cover SR.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top