Is There a Positive Integer k Making k*2^n + 1 Composite for All n?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thanks
ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Prove that there exists a positive integer k such that k 2^n+1 is composite for every positive integer n. (Hint: Consider the congruence class of n modulo 24 and apply the Chinese Remainder Theorem).

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Notice that

2^{24}=(2^3-1)(2^3+1)(2^6+1)(2^12+1)=3^2*5*7*13*4097

Let n=24q+r.
We want to write down enough equation of the form x \equiv a_i \mod m_i, where the m_i are relatively prime so that the solution k to these equations will have the desired properties.
This means that for each value of r in [0,23], we need to have a congruence equation such that 2^{24q+r}+1 \equiv m_i \mod a_ifor some i.
Notice that if we set

k 2^{24q}+1\equiv k+1 \equiv 0 \mod 3,

this takes care of all the cases where r is even (by Fermat's Little Theorem).
If we set

k 2^{24q+1}+1 \equiv 2 k +1 \equiv 0 \mod 5,

that takes care of r=1,5,9,13,17,21 by Fermat's Little Theorem.
Setting

k 2^{24q+3}+1 \equiv 8 k +1 \equiv 0 \mod 7
k 2^{24q+7}+1 \equiv 128 k +1 \equiv 0 \mod 13

we take care of all the rest of the possible r except 11 and 23. What I am unsure of is how to handle the cases of r = 11 and 23 without using a calculator to find that 4097 has 2 prime factors? But maybe I should have just checked whether 4097 was divisible by the the first 10 primes and found that indeed it was divisible by 17? Also, how would you arrive at the hint if you were working this problem in a test without the hint? Or is the hint kind of necessary?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top