Is There a Relationship Between g(1-s) and g(s) in L-Dirichlet Series?

eljose
Messages
484
Reaction score
0
let be the Dirichlet series in the form:

g(s)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a(n)n^{-s} my question is if there is a relationship between g(1-s) and g(s) for any L-Dirichlet series.

another question...where could i find Vinogradov,s work on Goldbach conjecture?..thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eljose said:
let be the Dirichlet series in the form:

g(s)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a(n)n^{-s} my question is if there is a relationship between g(1-s) and g(s) for any L-Dirichlet series.

of course there is, though it may not be nice adn interesting.
 
eljose said:
g(s)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a(n)n^{-s} my question is if there is a relationship between g(1-s) and g(s) for any L-Dirichlet series.

Not necessarily a nice one like the functional equations for Zeta or Dirichlet L-functions, and the question might not always even make sense. If the series for g(s) does not converge everywhere, g(1-s) won't make sense everywhere g(s) does, you have to consider if g can be extended to the entire plane.

You might want to look up what's usually called the Selberg class, it's an attempt to generalize the usual cast of L-functions.

eljose said:
another question...where could i find Vinogradov,s work on Goldbach conjecture?..thanks.

Have you tried searching MathSciNet?
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top