Is There a Root for cos(x) = x in the Interval (0,1)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter happysmiles36
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem Value
happysmiles36
Messages
54
Reaction score
2
From the Intermediate Value Theorem, is it guaranteed that there is a root of the given equation in the given interval?

cos(x)=x, (0,1)

cos(0)= 1
cox(1)= 0.540...

So using intermediate value theorem, no.

and

x=0 can't be possible because 0 was excluded in the domain by the round bracket so 0<x<1. Therefore there can't be a root. In other words the domain makes it so the graph is discontinuous at 0 (f(0) does not exist) and if the graph/function doesn't at that point there cannot be a root there.

The answer is yes, but I am struggling to understand why and I am not sure if the books answer is wrong or if I'm wrong.

*I also don't know why cos(x) = x , because when x=1 they aren't equal and would only be true at 1 point in this domain (when x=~0.79).
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's probably better to examine the equivalent question; Is there a solution to ##\cos x-x=0## on the interval ##(0,1)##?

The Intermediate Value Theorem says
If ##f## is continuous on ##[a,b]## and ##L## is strictly between ##f(a)## and ##f(b)##, then there is at least one point ##c## in ##(a,b)## satisfying ##f(c)=L##.

If we put ##f(x)=\cos x-x##, your (revised) question is asking whether there is ##c## in ##(0,1)## satisfying ##f(c)=0##, right?

Given that ##f(0)=\cos 0-0=1>0## and ##f(1)=\cos 1-1<0## (you should check that), do you see how the IVT guarantees a ##c## in ##(0,1)## with ##f(c)=0##? Do you see how this is the same as saying ##\cos c=c##?

Note that you also need to say something regarding the continuity of ##f(x)=\cos x-x## on the closed interval ##[0,1]##.
 
Oh ok, that makes sense, I thought the question was asking me to do something else.

gopher_p said:
For what it's worth, I'm not a big fan of the use of the word "root" in the problem statement. It'd probably be better to use the word "solution" in that context.

Yeah, that would have made it much clearer imo.
 
Last edited:
For what it's worth, I'm not a big fan of the use of the word "root" in the problem statement. It'd probably be better to use the word "solution" in that context.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top