I Is there a tie between half life and energy of decay?

AI Thread Summary
There is a noted trend indicating that shorter half-lives in radioactive isotopes often correspond to higher decay energies, though this relationship is complex and influenced by multiple factors. The Geiger-Nuttall law describes this correlation, particularly in alpha decay, where the mass of the isotope plays a significant role. While the assumption of a relationship between half-life and decay energy is reasonable, it is acknowledged that the dynamics can be intricate, especially for decay modes beyond alpha decay. The discussion highlights the challenges of simplifying these interactions into a straightforward representation. Overall, the relationship between half-life and decay energy remains a nuanced topic in nuclear physics.
Subductionzon
Messages
172
Reaction score
2
As we all know radioactive isotopes have different half lives and different decay energies. Is there any tie between how long or short the half life is and the amount of energy of decay? I know that it will be a rather complex problem, especially for alpha decay where the mass of the isotope could also figure into the problem
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is a cery complicated thing, as you say. There is a trend towards shorter half-lives for more energetic decays, but this is just one of multiple factors.
 
Thank you. That was what I assumed, but it is nice to have a "reasonable assumption" confirmed. It appears that it is too complicated to represent simply. Thank you for your response.
 
For alpha decay, it's not too bad an assumption!
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/34677838/alplot.gif

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/alptun.html

This relationship is known as the Geiger-Nuttall law.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geiger–Nuttall_law

##\ln \lambda = -a_1 \frac{Z}{\sqrt{E}}+a_2##

This shouldn't be too surprising considering the normal picture of alpha decay - a preformed alpha cluster rattling around in the potential of the nucleus - it has a chance to tunnel through the barrier, and that will be exponentially dependent on energy.

It'll be more complex for other decay modes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Back
Top