Is there a way to construct an open set whose boundary is A?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Newtime
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets
Newtime
Messages
347
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove: a set in a topological space is closed and nowhere dense if and only if it is the boundary of an open set.

Homework Equations


Basic definitions of closed, nowhere dense, open and boundary.

The Attempt at a Solution


One direction is easy. Let A \subset X be a subset in a topological space. Since \partial A = \bar{A} \cap \overline{X-A} and the (finite) interesection of closed sets is closed, the boundary is closed. We also have another interpretation of the boundary. Namely, \partial A = \bar{A} - \text{int}(A). The boundary is nowhere dense since the interior is the largest open set so deleting it means the boundary contains no nonempty open set.

I'm having trouble with the other direction. It seems necessary to do it by construction since there is no general criteria to conclude some random set is a boundary of an open set other than using the definitions, which is how most proofs go in point set topology. However, we know nothing about the set a priori or even about the space, so I'm pretty confused. I think all I need is a (small) nudge in the right direction and any help is appreciated. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
I figured it out. For anyone else stuck on this question: if A is a closed nowhere dense set, consider the set X-A.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top