Is there a word that relates to infinitesimal in the way that zero

Pjpic
Messages
235
Reaction score
1
Is there a word that relates to infinitesimal in the way that zero relates to infinity?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Pjpic said:
Is there a word that relates to infinitesimal in the way that zero relates to infinity?

I don't think that zero does relate to infinity.

In the hyperreal number system, there are two kinds of non-real numbers: infinitesimal and infinite. The reciprocal of any infinitesimal number is infinite. The reciprocal of any infinite number is infinitesimal. The inverse of zero is still undefined.
 


In the ordinary Real number system, there are neither infinite nor infinitesmal numbers. That's why most Calculus and Analysis deal with derivatives in terms of limits rather than infinitesmals. It takes some deep theory to be able to define the "hyperreals" that tac-tics refers to.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top