Is There Always a Solution for b^x - b^y to be Divisible by a?

Petr Mugver
Messages
279
Reaction score
0
For any natural number a and b, with b > 1, two natural numbers x and y can always be found such that b^x - b^y is divisible by a.

Until now, with many tries of a and b, I have always found corresponding x and y.

I would appreciate if somebody could give me a proof or a counter example.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Petr Mugver! :smile:

It seems to be always possible. Note that (if x>y) we can factor

b^x-b^y=b^y(b^{x-y}-1)

By this factorization, we can assume a coprime of b. Indeed, if pk is a prime power that divides both a and b, then pk will divide bk. So we just need to choose y>k.

Now, if a and b are coprime, then I claim that there is always a z such that a divides bz-1. Or, in other words, that bz=1 (mod a). This follows immediately from Euler's theorem and we can choose z=\varphi(a).
 
Thanks for the reply!

I need to "translate" it though (I am a physician and quite unfamiliar with all this number theory stuff), but I assume that your answer is correct, so just give me some time to understand it!

Now, please tell me: has your answer something to do with the proof I figured out, which is the following:

I calculate 1/a using Euclid Algorithm "in base b". Then 1/a will be a certain number c plus an infinite geometric series in b, in other words

1/a = c + d/(1 - b^-k) = [(cb^k - c) + db^k] / (b^k - 1)

so if d is not zero (b^k - 1) is divisible by a, and if d = 0 then b^k is divisible by a.

This is certainly less elegant, but is it the same thing?
 
Your proof is quite nice, but I don't see how you obtained the following:

Petr Mugver said:
Then 1/a will be a certain number c plus an infinite geometric series in b

You somehow applied Euclid's algorithm to something, but I don't quite see it. (also not that Euclid's algorithm applies to integers only!)
 
micromass said:
You somehow applied Euclid's algorithm to something, but I don't quite see it. (also not that Euclid's algorithm applies to integers only!)

For (a simple) example, let a = 6 and b = 10.

Calculating 1/6 in base 10 (that's what I mean by Euclid's Algorithm) you get

1/6 = 0,1666... = 16,666.../100 = (10 + 6 x sum_k(10^-k))/100 =
= (10 + 60/9)/100 = 150/900

so x = 3 and y = 2.
 
Would it make sense to think of the graph of z = b^y - b^x?

if (b^y-b^x)/a = integer

b^y - b^x = integer * a

z = integer * a

It should be a plane that intersects all values of z.
 
Last edited:
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top