Is There an Alternative to Anti-Commutation for Quantizing Fermions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kof9595995
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relation
kof9595995
Messages
676
Reaction score
2
Prescription of QM tells you to us commutation relation and when quantizing fermions it's problematic, then we use anti-commutation relation instead. But can't there be some other relation besides anti-commutation that is also compatible with fermions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kof9595995 said:
Prescription of QM tells you to us commutation relation and when quantizing fermions it's problematic, then we use anti-commutation relation instead. But can't there be some other relation besides anti-commutation that is also compatible with fermions?
In 4 dimensions, no. This is provable, and called the spin-statistics theorem: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin-statistics_theorem
 
Ok I'll try to have a look
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top