Is There an Easier Way to Prove S is Disconnected?

kimkibun
Messages
28
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Let S={zεℂ: |z|<1 or |z-2|<1}. show that S is not connected.

Homework Equations


My prof use this definition of disconnected set.

Disconnected set - A set S \subseteqℂ is disconnected if S is a union of two disjoint sets A and A' s.t. there exists open sets B and B' with A \subseteq B
and A' \subseteq B&#039;.

The Attempt at a Solution



So here's my solution. I let A={zεℂ: |z|<1} and A'={zεℂ: |z-2|<1}. in order for me to show that S is disconnected set, i need to show the following.

i.) S=A U A'
ii.) A and A' are disjoint
iii.) A and A' are open sets.

Am i doing the right way? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kimkibun said:
Disconnected set - A set S \subseteqℂ is disconnected if S is a union of two disjoint sets A and A' s.t. there exists open sets B and B' with A \subseteq B
and A' \subseteq B&#039;.
That doesn't work. is it perhaps: A set S \subseteqℂ is disconnected if S is a union of two sets A and A' s.t. there exists disjoint open sets B and B' with A \subseteq B and A' \subseteq B&#039;?
i.) S=A U A'
ii.) A and A' are disjoint
iii.) A and A' are open sets.
Looks good to me.
 
haruspex said:
That doesn't work. is it perhaps: A set S \subseteqℂ is disconnected if S is a union of two sets A and A' s.t. there exists disjoint open sets B and B' with A \subseteq B and A' \subseteq B&#039;?

sorry, you're right, i forgot the "disjoint" word.

haruspex said:
Looks good to me.


is there any other way (probably, easier) to prove that S is a disconnected set?
 
kimkibun said:
sorry, you're right, i forgot the "disjoint" word.

is there any other way (probably, easier) to prove that S is a disconnected set?

You are doing fine. You just have the three (easy!) things to prove about A and A'. And you may not have to do a terribly formal proof of each. Just indicate why they are true.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top