Is there an element that does not decay but can be identified from a

  • Thread starter Thread starter robsharp14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay Element
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the identification of elements that do not decay and can be detected from great distances. It highlights that spectroscopic methods allow for the analysis of an element's composition as long as the source is sufficiently bright, enabling researchers to identify the same elements across the universe. Additionally, it is noted that many elements in the periodic table possess at least one stable isotope that does not undergo decay, which contributes to their detectability. The conversation suggests that while uranium-238 has a long half-life, there are other stable isotopes that may be more relevant for distant identification.
robsharp14
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Is there an element that does not decay but can be identified from a extremely far distance or an element with a multi-billion year half life
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org


uranium-238
 


my theory is way too risky
 


Spectroscopic methods are not distance related - assuming source is bright enough we can research its composition from any distance. That's how we know there are the same elements in other parts of the Universe.
 


Not really sure what you are after here ... most of the elements in the periodic table have at least one stable isotope that does not decay.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top