Is there an opposite law to the law of greed in physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter deda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the concept of the "law of greed," which suggests that those who have more tend to accumulate even more. This idea is compared to principles in physics, particularly the second law of thermodynamics, which states that heat flows from hot to cold, indicating that systems naturally move towards equilibrium. Participants debate the implications of these concepts, with one suggesting that instability in systems, like a spinning top, leads to a chaotic accumulation of energy until a collapse occurs. This analogy reflects the idea that entities with more resources or energy may become increasingly unstable, ultimately leading to a breakdown. The conversation highlights the parallels between human behavior and physical laws, emphasizing the dynamics of accumulation and instability.
deda
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
I'm sure that you're all familiar with the law of greed cause it's a part of the humman nature but I'll say it any way:
"The one that has more tends to have even more and he usually gets it". I wonder if there is an equivalent law to the law of greed in the domains of physics or if it applies in the same form? I'm sure that there is an oposite equivalent law and it's the 2nd principle of termodynamics, according to which:
"The object that has less heat cannot spontaneously give it away to an object with more heat"
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by deda
I'm sure that you're all familiar with the law of greed cause it's a part of the humman nature but I'll say it any way:
"The one that has more tends to have even more and he usually gets it". I wonder if there is an equivalent law to the law of greed in the domains of physics or if it applies in the same form? I'm sure that there is an oposite equivalent law and it's the 2nd principle of termodynamics, according to which:
"The object that has less heat cannot spontaneously give it away to an object with more heat"

Heat spontaneously moves toward less heat; therefore, that which has more will have less. Which would be the opposite of what you stated.

Nautica
 
Perhaps it could have something to do with an unstable state? It gets more unstable and more unstable until it finaly collapses, the engergy being distributed in several parts that our produced from the collapse?
 
Originally posted by Sikz
Perhaps it could have something to do with an unstable state? It gets more unstable and more unstable until it finaly collapses, the engergy being distributed in several parts that our produced from the collapse?

you lost me

nautica
 
I was only observing that an unstable thing (atom, particle, etc) behaves in sort of that way (The one that has more tends to have even more and he usually gets it). It becomes more and more unstable, its energy being released more and more chaoticly and powerfully, until eventually it collapses.

A spinning top for instance- its wobbles continue to get bigger and more common, bigger and more common, bigger and more common, until finally it reaches the point where it can no longer function and it falls. This is similar to someone with a lot of things (energy) getting more and more (the chaotic realization of the energy).
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top