Courses Is There any Coding Bootcamp Worth it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter John d Marano
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coding
AI Thread Summary
FreeCodeCamp is a free online coding platform that is not classified as a traditional coding bootcamp. While the program is estimated to take around 1,600 hours to complete, this is a rough estimate and actual completion time varies based on individual learning speed. Users can start and stop the program at their convenience without any financial commitment, making it a low-risk option for learning to code. The material is generally considered decent, though it may require learners to seek answers independently, reflecting real-world problem-solving. Additionally, participants appreciate the opportunity to contribute to charitable projects while learning. Overall, FreeCodeCamp offers a valuable resource for those interested in coding without the pressure of a formal commitment.
John d Marano
Messages
46
Reaction score
4
I was thinking of Free Code Camp https://www.freecodecamp.com/ but not sure. I would appreciate some advice?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have no direct experience with freecodecamp.com, but according to their FAQ, they state that they are not a coding bootcamp. Since its free, you've got nothing to lose.
 
Jaeusm said:
I have no direct experience with freecodecamp.com, but according to their FAQ, they state that they are not a coding bootcamp. Since its free, you've got nothing to lose.

The price is right: free. The opportunity cost however is high. It takes 1,600 hours to complete the program so I wouldn't want to make a commitment to a substandard program if there's something better out there. Thanks for replying.
 
First, you're in no way "making a committment" to freecodecamp by doing it, you're free to start and stop whenever, and you're not in any way obligated to give up anything other than your free time to do it (no need to quit your job to do it like other code bootcamps typically require). Second, 1,600 hours to complete is more of a really rough estimate. How long it actually takes you is really dependent on how quickly you pick up the material, and you may find you finish it much faster.

Give it a try, you risk nothing other than time, and even then, if you find it's not helping you after a few days or weeks of effort, you can try something else.

Edit: As for the material itself, what I've seen is pretty decent. There are places where they don't give a lot of guidance, so you're expected to find some answers yourself, but that's not at all a bad thing since it's representative of the real world.
 
Last edited:
AstroEmma said:
Give it a try, you risk nothing other than time, and even then, if you find it's not helping you after a few days or weeks of effort, you can try something else.

I do like the idea of helping a charity. Thnaks
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Back
Top