Medical Is there any downsides to using birth control to stop menstruation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ensabah6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Control
AI Thread Summary
Using birth control to stop menstruation can have both benefits and downsides, which vary based on individual medical history and circumstances. It is crucial to consult a healthcare provider to evaluate personal risks and benefits, as every medication has potential side effects that need to be considered in the context of one's health status, including weight, blood pressure, and family history. Hormonal contraceptives carry inherent risks, such as the potential for blood clots, which can lead to serious conditions like stroke or pulmonary embolism. These risks are heightened for individuals who smoke or have clotting disorders. While some contraceptives may not carry the same warnings in other countries, it is essential to discuss any concerns and possible drug interactions with a doctor or pharmacist, especially regarding the impact of antibiotics on contraceptive efficacy. Overall, personalized medical advice is necessary for safe and effective use of birth control to manage menstruation.
ensabah6
Messages
691
Reaction score
0
is there any downsides to using birth control to stop menstruation?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
If you have access to medical care, please ask your doctor this question. Every single medication, drug, herbal supplement, food, etc (essentially everything you put in your body) has its potential up-sides and down-sides, and many (perhaps most) of them have to be evaluated in the context of your current medical status, including weight, BP, family history, other things you are taking, and a lot of other factors.
 
Last edited:
I agree with Turbo. While Moonbear, Adrenaline and Doc Toxin are probably the best qualified to respond, I'm sure that all of them would refer you to your personal physician. We're not shy or coy or embarrassed about discussing things like this, but nobody here is capable of answering personal medical questions which require insight into your own medical history. There are far too many factors involved which cannot (ever) be dealt with over the net. If anyone tells you otherwise, s/he is lying and should be ignored. Talk to your doctor.
 
Last edited:
As has already been indicated, you would want to discuss with your personal physician any specific concerns or risks related to your own medical history, the specific form of birth control you will be using, the duration of use, other medications you may be taking, etc. You can also talk to your pharmacist about potential side-effects, contraindications, and any potential drug interactions (for example, you should know that some antibiotics can reduce the efficacy of oral contraceptives, so if you are taking antibiotics, you will want to either use an alternative form of contraception or abstain during the full cycle following use).

In more general terms, there are inherent risks to all hormonal contraception, and some people are at greater risks of side effects than others. For example, all hormonal contraception in the U.S. comes with a warning of blood clots, which can lead to stroke or pulmonary embolism, as a serious side effect. This is a rare side effect, but your risks are greater if you're a smoker, or already have a predisposition to a clotting disorder. (I will note that the progestin-only contraceptives, i.e., Depo-Provera, do not carry this warning in other countries, and the scientific literature indicates it is the estrogens that primarily are the risk factor for blood clots, so I do not know if the labeling requirement in the US is based on known side effects, or just a blanket "cover our butt" warning the drug company lawyers told them to include.)
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
175
Back
Top