Is there any indication the Egyptians understood coprimes ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Isaacsname
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    prime
Isaacsname
Messages
63
Reaction score
9
My apologies for such an unorthodox question, move if necessary

I've not been able to find much on this, aside from that there is some conjecture { who, I have no idea } that they have understood and cataloged prime numbers.

If they cataloged prime numbers they certainly understood coprime relationships, I am assuming, or is that wrong to make that assumption ?

Is there anybody here who might have some knowledge of ancient mathematics ?

Thanks,
Isaac
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm no expert, but I hit WP on Egyptian Fractions (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egyptian_fraction)

"the methods used by the Egyptians may not correspond directly to these identities. Additionally, the expansions in the table do not match any single identity; rather, different identities match the expansions for prime and for composite denominators".

It seems to me that if they had tables of fractions based on products which led to prime and composite products in the denominator, it's safe to say that someone noticed coprime numbers... I think my question for you is what do you mean by the phrase "coprime relationships"?
 
Ok, thank you
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top