Selection on an Animal with a Dominant Genetic Disorder

  • Thread starter Thread starter wasteofo2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Animal Disorder
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a hypothetical animal species with a unique genetic disorder affecting lifespan and reproduction. An individual with this disorder dies at age 30, while the average lifespan is 50, and the disorder manifests after breeding age. The main question is whether there are mechanisms of selection against this individual and its offspring. Participants suggest that social structures and parental care could influence survival and breeding success. For example, if offspring rely on parental care, the early death of parents could negatively impact the young's chances of reaching sexual maturity. There is speculation about whether potential mates might select against individuals showing early signs of health issues related to the disorder, although it's noted that such discrimination is rare in the animal kingdom. The conversation also touches on the concepts of individual and group selection, indicating that while individual selection might not favor those with the disorder, group dynamics could play a role in the overall survival and reproductive success of the population.
wasteofo2
Messages
477
Reaction score
2
Let's say you have a hypothetical species of animal and on average, these animals reach sexual maturity at age 10, will breed from age 10 to age 20, and die at age 50.

Let's also say that there is an individual who is homozygous for a unique genetic disorder that will cause him to die at age 30, instead of age 50, and that this disorder only starts to kick in at age 25; after he has done all his breeding. Also, let's say that this disorder is dominant, so this individual's offspring will invariably die at age 30 as well.

If the negative aspects of this disorder do not begin to manifest themselves until age 25, and this individual breeds normally, is there any mechanism of selection against this individual and his offspring?

Thanks,
Jacob
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Just a first thought: If families stay together or offspring depend on parents, there could be effects on breeding. For instance, families may control territory, or children whose parents die soon after giving birth may have a lesser chance of surviving to sexual maturity. Animals could also notice the general healthiness of a family and tend to choose the healthiest, but I don't know how likely this is (I can't think of an animal other than humans that could do this, but I don't know).
 
If it was a social animal with offspring that depended upon parental care for a long period of time after birth, it could be selected against, as Rachel pointed out. Even if the young do not depend on parental care, by both parents, for 5-10 years after birth (no animal does outside of humans), there could be other effects of this gene that physically manifest themselves earlier than breeding age that a potential mate could pick up on and be turned off by. It doesn't even have to be the effect of the same gene; it could be the effect of a gene that is simply located very close to the disease gene. I really don't think there are any animals out there, however, that discriminate sexually against mates that will die young, as long as they are sexually healthy and can provide protection during pregnancy and infancy. Even humans don't discriminate like that.
 
Individual selection and group selection

loseyourname said:
I really don't think there are any animals out there [...] that discriminate sexually against mates that will die young
In addition to individual animals, there are animal groups.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top