Is there any proof to show that gravity works at the Planck length?

AI Thread Summary
There is currently no experimental proof that gravity operates at the Planck length, which is approximately twenty orders of magnitude smaller than measurable scales. The discussion highlights that while gravity's effects can be observed at larger scales, its behavior at the Planck length remains speculative and unverified. Some participants argue that the Planck length is not inherently special, while others assert its significance in quantum theories of gravity. The conversation also touches on the implications of gravity potentially becoming infinite at the Planck scale, though this remains a contentious point. Overall, the topic reflects ongoing debates in physics regarding the nature of gravity at quantum scales.
mitrasoumya
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Is there any experimental proof which shows that the force of gravity works at Planck length? Has it been verified already? Is it verifiable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nothing at the Planck length is currently observable as far as I know. So I don't think any experiments have been set up in an attempt to test anything at that scale.
 
  • Like
Likes mitrasoumya
Do we even have the accuracy and precision to measure the force of gravity at atomic level? I would be actually really surprised if we do.
 
  • Like
Likes mitrasoumya
mitrasoumya said:
Is there any experimental proof which shows that the force of gravity works at Planck length? Has it been verified already? Is it verifiable?
Plank length is approximately TWENTY ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE smaller than anything we can currently measure, so no. BUT ... there is nothing special about the plank length in that regard, any more than there's anything special about the meter or the foot.
 
  • Like
Likes TheOldFart, Tazerfish, mitrasoumya and 1 other person
  • Like
Likes mitrasoumya and Biker
phinds said:
Plank length is approximately TWENTY ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE smaller than anything we can currently measure, so no. BUT ... there is nothing special about the plank length in that regard, any more than there's anything special about the meter or the foot.
But how can we say that so confidently about something we haven't been able to measure as yet.
 
Because there is no reason to think that Planck length is special. If there is no reason, why should we think it is special? There are other "planck units", like Planck resistance, which I read here (didn't calculate it myself) is about 30 ohms. Why should we think it's special?
 
  • Like
Likes mitrasoumya
weirdoguy said:
Because there is no reason to think that Planck length is special. If there is no reason, why should we think it is special? There are other "planck units", like Planck resistance, which I read here (didn't calculate it myself) is about 30 ohms. Why should we think it's special?
Plank length is the shortest meaningful distance and therefore it IS special.
 
mitrasoumya said:
Plank length is the shortest meaningful distance and therefore it IS special.

That's only true for certain quantum theories of gravity. All of which are hypothetical and are not currently accepted as mainstream theories.
 
  • Like
Likes mitrasoumya
  • #10
mitrasoumya said:
Plank length is the shortest meaningful distance and therefore it IS special.
you are giving it too much importance

you really need to listen to what the others are telling you :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes mitrasoumya
  • #11
Drakkith said:
That's only true for certain quantum theories of gravity. All of which are hypothetical and are not currently accepted as mainstream theories.
But the "mainstream" is incomplete, and therefore leaves gaps that have to be filled by some or other hypothesis. The assumption that gravity acts at Planck length is still an assumption. And all assumptions tend to limit our imagination. The "obviousness" of objects falling down, the idea of absolute space and absolute time were all assumptions that have been proved wrong by proof.
 
  • #12
mitrasoumya said:
But the "mainstream" is incomplete, and therefore leaves gaps that have to be filled by some or other hypothesis.

And?

mitrasoumya said:
assumption that gravity acts at Planck length is still an assumption.

If it doesn't act at the Planck length, then how does it act at larger distances? All known fundamental forces become stronger at shorter distances. The idea that gravity acts at all lengths is far more than an assumption in my opinion.
 
  • Like
Likes OnlyMe and mitrasoumya
  • #13
davenn said:
you really need to listen to what the others are telling you

This.

If it were me, I'd learn what physics says before complaining that physicists are doing it wrong and limiting their imagination. Just sayin;.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes mitrasoumya
  • #14
Drakkith said:
All known fundamental forces become stronger at shorter distances.
Yes. And that implies that the force would become infinite at plank length! Which perhaps has no observational evidence.
 
  • #15
mitrasoumya said:
Yes. And that implies that the force would become infinite at plank length!

Please show or reference some calculations supporting this.
 
  • #16
mitrasoumya said:
Yes. And that implies that the force would become infinite at plank length!
That's just ridiculous. The Plank Length is not zero, you know.

@mitrasoumya you really need to study some basics and not make statements that you can't back up.
 
  • #18
From a simple Occam's Razor perspective, one should first assume the laws apply at all scales. Because otherwise you might as well start checking whether gravity works behind your house.
 
  • Like
Likes TheOldFart, Drakkith and sophiecentaur
  • #19
phinds said:
The Plank Length is not zero.
It is 0.000000000000000000000000000000000016 m
 
  • #20
So?
 
  • #21
mitrasoumya said:
It is 0.000000000000000000000000000000000016 m
And yet you treated it like zero. Do you not see the contradiction?
 
  • #22
No, nothing is observable at this scale, but some physicists think that gravity could be significant at the Planck scale, giving rise to fluctuations and possibly wormholes. There have been many attempts to understand what physics may be going on here, something I have taken interest in investigating myself.

For instance, there is possible a non-trivial relationship called a spacetime uncertainty in natural units c=1

\Delta x \Delta t \geq \ell^2_P

This is a non-commutation relationship between space and time - and while it is written like a spacetime uncertainty, it's actually just a reinterpretation of the length in which it takes to scatter particles.

\Delta x \approx \frac{1}{\Delta p}

Both quantum loop gravity and string theory predicts the relationship. The length on the right hand side of the inequality, refers to Planck spacetime.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top