Is There Any Reversible Quasi-Static Process?

Click For Summary
Quasi-static processes are typically reversible, as they maintain thermal equilibrium with their surroundings throughout the process. However, a quasi-static process can be irreversible if it takes an infinitely long time without maintaining this equilibrium. An example of a reversible process is heat transfer from a large reservoir to a gas, allowing for work to be done at a slow pace. In contrast, if gas escapes into a vacuum at a slow rate, the process remains quasi-static but becomes irreversible. The discussion emphasizes the ideal nature of these processes, which are not fully achievable in practice.
Kevin_Axion
Messages
912
Reaction score
3
Just out of curiosity, is there any quasi-static process that is completely reversible? I think the answer is an obvious no because any quasi-static process experiences a net energy loss but I'd like to know if there are any, possibly something abstract rather then mechanical.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kevin_Axion said:
Just out of curiosity, is there any quasi-static process that is completely reversible? I think the answer is an obvious no because any quasi-static process experiences a net energy loss but I'd like to know if there are any, possibly something abstract rather then mechanical.
Quasi-static processes ARE usually reversible. A reversible change is one in which the system and its surroundings are arbitrarily close to being in thermal equilibrium at all times. A quasi-static change is one that takes an arbitrarily long time to complete. Both are ideal situations and are not really achievable in practice.

AM
 
Just as a follow-up. A quasi-static process that is not reversible would be one which takes an infinitely long time to complete but during which the system and surroundings are not infinitessimally close to equilibrium.

An example of a reversible process would be heat flow from an infinitely large reservoir at temperature T + dT to a system gas at temperature T. Heat would flow from the reservoir to the gas reversibly (ie system and surroundings are arbitrarily close to equilibrium at all times) and the gas at pressure P + dP would expand and do work at an infinitessimally slow pace (ie. quasi-static) against an external pressure P.

Now if, instead of doing work on its surroundings by expanding arbitrarily slowly against an external pressure of P, the gas simply escaped at an arbitrarily slow rate into a vacuum through a hole in the system container that was infinitessimally small, the process would be quasi-static (ie it would take an infinite or arbitrarily long time) but would not be reversible (you could not with an arbitrarily small change in conditions get the gas to flow back from the vacuum into the system container).

AM
 
Last edited:
Thread 'What is the pressure of trapped air inside this tube?'
As you can see from the picture, i have an uneven U-shaped tube, sealed at the short end. I fill the tube with water and i seal it. So the short side is filled with water and the long side ends up containg water and trapped air. Now the tube is sealed on both sides and i turn it in such a way that the traped air moves at the short side. Are my claims about pressure in senarios A & B correct? What is the pressure for all points in senario C? (My question is basically coming from watching...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
417
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K