Is a quasi-static but irreversible process possible?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the relationship between quasi-static and reversible processes in thermodynamics. Participants explore whether a process can be quasi-static yet irreversible, examining definitions and providing examples from various contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that quasi-static and reversible processes are equivalent, questioning if a quasi-static process can be irreversible.
  • Examples of quasi-static but irreversible processes are proposed, including heat transfer through a low-conductivity wall and evaporation from a pinhole in a water container.
  • It is noted that all real processes are irreversible, and slowing down a process can make it quasi-static without guaranteeing reversibility.
  • One participant suggests that the definition of reversible processes in textbooks may be incomplete, emphasizing that a reversible process does not change the total entropy of the system and its surroundings.
  • Another participant explains that energy transfer driven by gradients produces entropy, thus violating reversibility, and that reversibility can only be approached through slight gradients associated with low rates.
  • Further elaboration is provided on how finite velocity and temperature gradients contribute to entropy generation, linking these concepts to the irreversibility of processes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the definitions and implications of quasi-static and reversible processes. Multiple competing views remain on whether quasi-static processes can be irreversible, and the discussion does not reach a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in definitions and assumptions regarding the relationship between entropy, reversibility, and process rates, but do not resolve these issues.

goodphy
Messages
212
Reaction score
8
Hello.

I read the textbook of the thermodynamic and it said the definition of the reversible process as "thermodynamic process which is slow enough so the system state is always infinitesimally close to the thermodynamic equilibrium (quasi-static) during the process. Such a process can always be reversed without changing the thermodynamic state of the universe". I accepted this definition in a way that "quasi-static" and "reversible" is equivalent.

Is this true? Is there any process which is quasi-static but not reversible?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Heat transfer from a hot slab to a cold slab through an intervening wall of very low thermal conductivity.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: goodphy
goodphy said:
Is there any process which is quasi-static but not reversible?

A reversible process doesn't increase entropy and thus cannot exist in the real world (although we can come arbitrarily close). Every real process is irreversible. You can generally slow down a process as much as you wish to satisfy your criterion for "quasi-static". Another simple example to complement Chester's is a container of water with a pinhole opening, left to evaporate. Others are a battery attached to a very high resistance, a load applied to a solid at a low temperature (i.e., a solid with little propensity to creep) or a high-viscosity liquid, a nonspherical asteroid, or an amorphous solid whose equilibrium state is crystalline.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Castello and goodphy
Mapes said:
A reversible process doesn't increase entropy and thus cannot exist in the real world (although we can come arbitrarily close). Every real process is irreversible. You can generally slow down a process as much as you wish to satisfy your criterion for "quasi-static". Another simple example to complement Chester's is a container of water with a pinhole opening, left to evaporate. Others are a battery attached to a very high resistance, a load applied to a solid at a low temperature (i.e., a solid with little propensity to creep) or a high-viscosity liquid, a nonspherical asteroid, or an amorphous solid whose equilibrium state is crystalline.

Thanks you! you and Chestermiller suggest examples of a quasi-static and irreversible process. I've searched the internet and found that the reversible process is quasi-static but its converse is not guaranteed. So, I think the definition of the reversible process given in my book has some hole. So, the true definition of the reversible process is that the reversible process is the process which doesn't change a total entropy of the system and its surrounding or simply the entropy of the universe, right?

Could you tell me why the reversible process has to be quasi-static? Why the process which is done pretty much fast so never be quasi-static has to be an irreversible process?
 
Whenever energy transfer is driven by a gradient (e.g., a pressure difference causing a change in volume, a voltage difference causing electric charge transfer, or a temperature difference that heats something up), entropy is produced and reversibility is violated. In contrast, steep gradients are associated with rapid process because the driving force is large. So reversibility can only be approached through very slight gradients, resulting in low rates (i.e., quasi-static processes).
 
To add to what Mapes said, in a system featuring finite velocity gradients, entropy generation is caused by viscous dissipation of mechanical energy to internal energy, and the local rate of entropy generation per unit volume is proportional to the square of the velocity gradient and to the viscosity. In a system featuring finite temperature gradients, the local rate of entropy generation per unit volume is proportional to the square of the temperature gradient and to the thermal conductivity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
10K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K