Quasi(Almost) Equilibrium(Static) Processes <-> Real Life Processes

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter premie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Life
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of quasi-equilibrium and quasistatic processes in the context of real-life applications, particularly focusing on heat engines and heat pumps. Participants explore the differences between idealized models and actual operational behaviors of these systems, questioning the applicability of the quasistatic and reversible classifications in practical scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that textbooks describe quasi-equilibrium processes as ideal, suggesting that real systems can only approach this ideal but never fully achieve it.
  • Another participant asserts that real-life engine cycles are not reversible, supporting this claim with reasoning related to chemical reactions.
  • A participant speculates on the reversibility of heat pumps, questioning how the rapid processes in the compression branch can still be considered reversible.
  • It is mentioned that processes may be treated as quasi-static if they occur slowly relative to the time required for the system to reach equilibrium, which aids in mathematical descriptions.
  • A later reply acknowledges that while the compression branch is idealized as reversible adiabatic, real processes involve entropy changes, indicating that they deviate from the ideal model.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the reversibility of real-life processes, particularly in heat engines and heat pumps. While some argue that these processes cannot be reversible, others question the criteria for reversibility in the context of rapid operations.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the idealization of processes, noting that real systems experience entropy changes and do not perfectly align with theoretical models. The discussion reflects a range of assumptions about the definitions and implications of quasi-static and reversible processes.

premie
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Quasi(Almost) Equilibrium(Static) Processes <---> Real Life Processes

Hi,

I am posting here for the first time, hence, should I have violated any forum rules I am sorry and kindly advise.

I am a novice so please bear with me. Thank you.

I read everywhere (in textbooks) that a quasiequilibrium or a quasistatic process is an ideal process and we try to achieve same whilst modelling any system. But in reality we get close to quasiequilibrium or quasistatic but never overlap the ideal form of it. Just able to get as closer as we can to a quasiequilibrium or quasistatic.

Now my question is, in real life I have seen heat engines and heat pumps working really fast. This is what I observe. Should I look at the vapor compression air conditioners (heat pump) or 4 Wheeler's IC Engine (heat engine). They all work really really fast. So how are they said to be almost quasistatic/quasiequilibrium?

Quasistatic/quasiequilibrium are also said to be reversible. Now when these real life equipments are working helluva fast, how can the processes going inside them are termed to be reversible?

Please help me out of this predicament.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Real life engine cycles are not reversible for the reasons you cited.
 
dauto said:
Real life engine cycles are not reversible for the reasons you cited.

Thanks for your reply, dauto.

Yes. Forget (heat) Engines. I'd speculate they aren't reversible as the chemical reaction, in their circumstance, cannot be reversed.

I wanted to ask that (heat) Pumps, albeit working really fast, are said to be reversible/quasistatic.

Take, for example, only the 'compression branch' of the whole vapor compression cycle. It is said to be reversible, despite of the fact that in real life the refrigerant goes from saturated vapor to a superheated vapor very very rapidly.

How is it said to be reversible, although its going so fast?

  • Is it said to be reversible because it is able to come to the initial state after going through few stages?

  • Would that imply reversible just not only means, going 2 → 1 should have gone 1 → 2 initially, but that 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 → 1 is also reversible?

This would help modify my understanding of 'reversible' processes.
Thanks.
 
In practice, processes are not quasi-static and not thermodynamically reversible. They may be considered as quasi-static because they are still quite slow compared to time of relaxation of non-equilibrium state they go through. This is useful because quasi-static process are easily described mathematically.
 
Thank you Jano L.
Starting to make sense now.

I have also read that this was idealized (i.e. compression branch in the vapor-compression cycle, idealized to be reversible adiabatic).

In reality, it is not ideal but the entropy increases a little by the time the super heated vapor leaves the compressor. Hence real (Δs ≠ 0) , but not ideal (Δs = 0).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
14K