Is there impulse during a collision only?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ali Hamaiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision Impulse
AI Thread Summary
Impulse is defined as the change in momentum resulting from a force applied over time, and it occurs during collisions, including those with air molecules and the ground. While a collision with a massive object like the ground transfers impulse, the effect on the ground's velocity is negligible due to its large mass. The discussion clarifies that impulse is not limited to significant collisions but can also occur in less noticeable interactions, such as with air resistance. However, these smaller impulses are often overlooked due to their minimal impact. Overall, impulse is fundamentally linked to momentum transfer, regardless of the scale of the collision.
Ali Hamaiz
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I know there are many websites on Internet but I can not understand any. My teacher says impulse is only during a collision of one body with other (when a car collide with other car etc.). My question is will there be impulse when a body is accelerating , when it collides with the air molecules , and with the ground (as it moves when it collides with the ground). I am confused in this topic and what does it means that impulse is the integral of net force. J=∫F dt
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ali Hamaiz said:
I know there are many websites on Internet but I can not understand any. My teacher says impulse is only during a collision of one body with other (when a car collide with other car etc.). My question is will there be impulse when a body is accelerating , when it collides with the air molecules , and with the ground (as it moves when it collides with the ground). I am confused in this topic and what does it means that impulse is the integral of net force.
Since force is mass times acceleration according to Newton's second law, and velocity is the integral of acceleration, i.e. the amount of change summed over a period of time, to yield a final velocity, it follows, that mass times velocity - the impulse - is the integral of force.
$$ F = m \cdot a(t) \Longrightarrow \int F = \int m \cdot a(t) dt = m\cdot \int a(t)dt = m \cdot v(t) = Imp$$
So far to the mathematical part of your question. On Wikipedia we find:
Impulse applied to an object produces an equivalent vector change in its linear momentum, also in the same direction.
Mathematically there is no difference between momentum and impulse, as there isn't a difference between velocity and speed. So it is basically about how we use the two terms. The equation above shows us, that only the (not changing) mass of an object and its velocity plays a role for its impulse, resp. momentum. Since both have nothing to do with a collision, the momentum is a property of a moving object. O.k., zero velocity leads to zero momentum, so we don't even need movement. A collision can be viewed as a kind of measurement: all of a sudden the velocity changes in a short period of time and the impulse is transferred to another object, in your example above to another car (Newton's third law). This "measures" the amount of impulse. So I guess (I'm no native English speaker), that impulse is reserved to the transfer of momentum and therefore a sort of collision is needed, whereas momentum is reserved to the object's property independent of any measurement. If you consider collisions with air molecules (or with the road the car is driving on), then you get the concept of air resistance (or friction). They also result in a change of velocity and therefore a change of momentum. However, they are harder to measure than the collision measurement with another car would be.
 
@fresh_42 So this means that there will be no impulse acting on a body during collision with the ground and to define these terms we use friction not the impulse .But can we say there is impulse as the momentum of a body is transferred to the air molecules (if we get to measure the rate of collision).
 
Ali Hamaiz said:
@fresh_42 So this means that there will be no impulse acting on a body during collision with the ground..
Why that? Any collision with a massive object transfers impulse, even to the ground. But in this case we have
$$\text{ mass}_{\text{ object }} \cdot \text{ change of velocity}_{\text{ object}} = \text{ mass}_{\text{ earth}}\cdot \text{ change of velocity}_{\text{ earth}}$$
so you won't see much of a change in velocity of the ground (=earth).
... and to define these terms we use friction not the impulse.
No. Forget the friction in this case. It was only an example of a source for change in velocity.
But can we say there is impulse as the momentum of a body is transferred to the air molecules (if we get to measure the rate of collision).
Well, yes. Driving a car causes airflow as a result of the collision of the car with air molecules.

For short:
momentum = mass ##\cdot## velocity
impulse = momentum transfer during a collision
 
I know get it , the conclusion is that yes there is impulse when the collision is with the air molecules but we do not consider it because there magnitudes are small .

Appreciated your answers , Thanks.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top