Is There Irony in OJ Simpson's Verdicts 13 Years Apart?

  • Thread starter Thread starter WhoWee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Years
AI Thread Summary
OJ Simpson's recent guilty verdict on 12 counts has sparked discussions about the irony of the timing, occurring 13 years after his infamous murder trial verdict. Participants reflect on the implications of his potential earlier conviction, speculating that had he been found guilty in the murder case, he might have been released around this time. The conversation touches on the inconsistencies in the U.S. justice system, particularly regarding sentencing for violent crimes, and the public's perception of Simpson's actions during both trials. Some express views on the evidence presented in the recent case, emphasizing the clarity of video and audio proof against him. The thread also considers the possibility of parole, with some betting on whether he will be released after serving nine years. Overall, the discussion centers on the irony of Simpson's legal journey and the broader themes of justice and accountability.
WhoWee
Messages
219
Reaction score
0
AOL reported that OJ Simpson was found guilty on 12 counts...13 Years to the Day of his other famous verdict...any thoughts on the irony?

I'm not attempting to judge (or comment) on his guilt/innocence.

It merely occurred to me that if he WAS found guilty the first time...he MIGHT have been released right about NOW?

Does anyone know if/when he would have gotten out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It gets better...13 is a BAD BAD Number

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081004/ap_on_re_us/oj_simpson
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This story really is way too one-sided. I think I recall the guy he 'stormed into' stole a bunch of stuff that was his and was selling it off. So he went in there to get his stuff back.
 
He took the law into his own hands. He is nothing but a two-bit thug.

I agreed with the verdict in the murder trial because of the actions of the police. The rule of law was the greater imperative. But justice finally found its target. Good riddance.
 
Racist cops YET AGAIN!!
 
Again, the thread is about the irony of the situation and the timing of the event.

Does anyone know when OJ COULD have been eligible for release IF he had been found guilty the first time?

If he'd been locked up...these events wouldn't have been possible...and he'd be free (maybe) now...instead...he might spend the rest of his life in prison for a lesser charge.
 
It seems that the correlation between the facts about the crime and the sentence is not very good in the US.
 
No argument...I just wanted to discuss the irony.
 
I think O.J. would have been convicted to life in jail without parole if found guilty in his murder trial.
 
  • #10
That's what I'd like to determine...as you said (more or less)...our system has inconsistencies.

While it was a double homicide, it would also have been a first offense and a clear crime of passion...AND there was clearly public support of him.

I don't think the judge would have given the maximum penalty...if he had a choice.

Hopefully someone knowledgeable about California criminal law will respond.
 
  • #11
I don't see why if it was first degree he wouldn't be two consecutive life sentences without parole.
If voluntary manslaughter, then I think max is 10 years US. Not sure if less in cali.
 
  • #12
Again, I don't know?
 
  • #13
WhoWee said:
AOL reported that OJ Simpson was found guilty on 12 counts...13 Years to the Day of his other famous verdict...any thoughts on the irony?

I'm not attempting to judge (or comment) on his guilt/innocence.

It merely occurred to me that if he WAS found guilty the first time...he MIGHT have been released right about NOW?

Does anyone know if/when he would have gotten out?
He was found guilty so there is no innocence to comment on, and I hope they lock him up and throw away the key. It was a little difficult for him to deny the video and audio evidence from surveillance cameras. He could hardly accuse them of racism.

He was also found culpable of murder in the civil courts for his earlier crime and if the criminal court jury had done their job properly and convicted him as they should have done I doubt he would ever have seen the light of day again.

IMO it's good riddance to bad rubbish.
 
  • #14
O.J. Simpson sentenced to at least 15 years

Up to 33.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iUNgbOr-2bnpFUX0MiII6je2CkRAD94SNBQG0
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #15
It seems to me that Justice has stumbled across the right result at last but, likely for a lot of wrong reasons, and certainly without any particular glory.

Apparently the narcissist Simpson just couldn't manage to not screw up again and fouled another one off. But this time society's catchers mitt finally caught one of his foul ball, after letting another slip away so ingloriously.
 
  • #16
Wow! Eligible for parole in 9 years. He'll be 70.

Any bets he gets out his first try?
 
  • #17
chemisttree said:
Wow! Eligible for parole in 9 years. He'll be 70.

Any bets he gets out his first try?

Yeah, I'll push that one. $20 says he doesn't. If he is denied, I'll send you a PM in 2017 to collect.

*spits on hand*

Shake?
 

Similar threads

  • Poll Poll
OJ Simpson Trial: 10 Year Anniversary Lookback and Discussion
Replies
3
Views
2K
News Will Charlie Rangel's Guilty Verdict Affect His Re-Election Chances?
Replies
15
Views
3K
News Should the US Extradite Amanda Knox to Italy?
Replies
21
Views
10K
News Libyan kangaroos to rule on capital verdict today
Replies
19
Views
4K
If you're thinking of marrying a biochemist
Replies
4
Views
3K
News Does 'pack journalism' shape the science news we read?
Replies
15
Views
3K
Is my phone actually listening in on me?
2
Replies
50
Views
9K
Why Are Kids Mimicking Saddam's Execution?
Replies
15
Views
4K
Is Evolutionary Theory Undermined by Creationist Claims?
6
Replies
266
Views
29K
Which Chooses Fate: The Lady or the Tiger?
Replies
8
Views
6K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top