N468989
- 92
- 0
we are visitors... simple as that.
N468989 said:we are visitors... simple as that.
Schrodinger's Dog said:Prove it?
N468989 said:I can only imagine, life itself most certainly formed on earth, due to our conditions in which we survive, but by what means can we prove that we are not from somewhere else. It's like someone lives in country XYZ, and was born in ABC, does it mean that, where they live now is where they have always been?
You say "Prove A" and i say "Prove !A".
We cannot prove that, since there isn't proof yet or may never be, maybe the absence of proof is proof itself!
We can't find the missing link.
Schrodinger's Dog said:Why?
Isn't that just a strong anthropic principle? And thus begging the question endlessly.
N468989 said:We can only imagine it's that way, due to our limited understanding of our being. We might be capable of understanding someday, but not today. What we know as valid today, tomorrow can be invalid. Didn't we believe the sun circled the earth?
Proof is there but we haven't been looking hard enough.
Is there life in the universe? Yes, we are part of the universe, so there is life!
Has it visited earth? Without proof, the answer in our living days is no...now its a matter of "to believe or not to believe".
Schrodinger's Dog said:How do you induct that?
How do you know we aren't alone?
N468989 said:To fully understand if we are, or not alone, we must first define what we understand by alone.
Beforehand, we must understand who we are, what is our meaning of existence (if there is such), and what is our purpose.
We can't find the missing link.
N468989 said:To fully understand if we are, or not alone, we must first define what we understand by alone.
Beforehand, we must understand who we are, what is our meaning of existence (if there is such), and what is our purpose.
DaveC426913 said:Why?
"Just as the pigment chlorophyll converts sunlight into chemical energy that allows green plants to live and grow, our research suggests that melanin can use a different portion of the electromagnetic spectrum - ionizing radiation - to benefit the fungi containing it," said co-researcher Ekaterina Dadachova.
Investigating further, the researchers measured the electron spin resonance signal after melanin was exposed to ionizing radiation and found that radiation interacts with melanin to alter its electron structure. This, they believe, is an essential step for capturing radiation and converting it into a different form of energy to make food.
Ivan Seeking said:Heh, the swamp gas explanation was an admitted dodge. That came from Hynek when he was still heading up Bluebook for the USAF. He later became a convert and the so-called father of modern ufology.
...not to say that swamp gas have never been the cause of a UFO report. Atmostpheric phenomena are certainly at least one class of UFOs.
baywax said:Its always going to be classified as swamp gas..
http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/10/aaah.jpg
There must be some way to identify if swamp gas is extraterrestrial or not.
Galteeth said:In other words, doesn't it seem that it's very unlikely that aliens would be visiting us secretly but get accidentally detected as UFOs?
TurtleMeister said:Wouldn't it be very unlikely that if aliens were secretly visiting us that their being detected as UFOs would make any difference?
TurtleMeister said:Wouldn't it be very unlikely that if aliens were secretly visiting us that their being detected as UFOs would make any difference?
Galteeth said:No. If they were indifferent to detection and were visiting us, we would have more reliable evidence of them. If they are making some effort to shield themselves from detection, they would not be detected by random people, pilots, and radar but be undetectable by more substantive methods. In other words, if they were able to be seen by people, photographed, and detectable by radar, what are the odds that more reliable evidence of them wouldn't have turned up by now?
baywax said:The difference would be that our behaviour would change toward pandemic panic and their observations of our natural state would be spoiled.
Sorry, my post was meant to be partly for humor.Ivan Seeking said:We need to end this line of discussion as it is far too speculative. It is fair to say we cannot anticipate with confidence the motives or thought processes of any ET species, should they exist.
When we can explain the motives and actions of teenagers, then we can talk about ET
baywax said:![]()
Anyone seen this? I had no idea the research goes as far back as 1949
http://www.nicap.org/waves/1949fullrep.htm
baywax said:![]()
Anyone seen this? I had no idea the research goes as far back as 1949
http://www.nicap.org/waves/1949fullrep.htm
Blenton said:How disheartening would it be to discover over millennia of searching for life that we are the first that has evolved from the galaxy. The possibility is there.