Is there life in the universe, and if so has it visited Earth?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the probability of extraterrestrial life in the universe, supported by the vast number of stars and the Drake equation, which suggests intelligent life likely exists. While participants agree on the likelihood of life elsewhere, there is skepticism regarding whether such life has visited Earth, with some arguing that the technological barriers and vast distances make encounters improbable. The conversation also touches on the implications of advanced civilizations and the potential for interstellar travel, raising questions about our ability to detect extraterrestrial visitors. Participants express varied opinions on the survival of intelligent civilizations and the factors influencing their communication capabilities. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards the existence of life beyond Earth, while doubts remain about direct contact.

Has alien life visited Earth?

  • Yes

    Votes: 81 14.5%
  • no

    Votes: 201 35.9%
  • no: but it's only a matter of time

    Votes: 64 11.4%
  • Yes: but there is a conspiracy to hide this from us

    Votes: 47 8.4%
  • maybe maybe not?

    Votes: 138 24.6%
  • I just bit my tongue and it hurts, what was the question again? Er no comment

    Votes: 29 5.2%

  • Total voters
    560
  • #931
we are visitors... simple as that.
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
  • #932
N468989 said:
we are visitors... simple as that.

Prove it?
 
  • #933
Schrodinger's Dog said:
Prove it?


I can only imagine, life itself most certainly formed on earth, due to our conditions in which we survive, but by what means can we prove that we are not from somewhere else. It's like someone lives in country XYZ, and was born in ABC, does it mean that, where they live now is where they have always been?

You say "Prove A" and i say "Prove !A".

We cannot prove that, since there isn't proof yet or may never be, maybe the absence of proof is proof itself!

We can't find the missing link.
 
  • #934
N468989 said:
I can only imagine, life itself most certainly formed on earth, due to our conditions in which we survive, but by what means can we prove that we are not from somewhere else. It's like someone lives in country XYZ, and was born in ABC, does it mean that, where they live now is where they have always been?

You say "Prove A" and i say "Prove !A".

We cannot prove that, since there isn't proof yet or may never be, maybe the absence of proof is proof itself!

We can't find the missing link.

Why?

Isn't that just a strong anthropic principle? And thus begging the question endlessly.
 
  • #935
Schrodinger's Dog said:
Why?

Isn't that just a strong anthropic principle? And thus begging the question endlessly.

We can only imagine it's that way, due to our limited understanding of our being. We might be capable of understanding someday, but not today. What we know as valid today, tomorrow can be invalid. Didn't we believe the sun circled the earth?

Proof is there but we haven't been looking hard enough.

Is there life in the universe? Yes, we are part of the universe, so there is life!
Has it visited earth? Without proof, the answer in our living days is no...now its a matter of "to believe or not to believe".
 
  • #936
N468989 said:
We can only imagine it's that way, due to our limited understanding of our being. We might be capable of understanding someday, but not today. What we know as valid today, tomorrow can be invalid. Didn't we believe the sun circled the earth?

Proof is there but we haven't been looking hard enough.

Is there life in the universe? Yes, we are part of the universe, so there is life!
Has it visited earth? Without proof, the answer in our living days is no...now its a matter of "to believe or not to believe".

How do you induct that?

How do you know we aren't alone?

the Sun and the Earth both circle each other, from each others relative perspective.

Infinity rests on being able to tell where you are, and when.
 
  • #937
Schrodinger's Dog said:
How do you induct that?

How do you know we aren't alone?

To fully understand if we are, or not alone, we must first define what we understand by alone.
Beforehand, we must understand who we are, what is our meaning of existence (if there is such), and what is our purpose.
 
  • #938
N468989 said:
To fully understand if we are, or not alone, we must first define what we understand by alone.
Beforehand, we must understand who we are, what is our meaning of existence (if there is such), and what is our purpose.

I think therefore I am, you however I'm not so sure about?

Is that it?

Very René Descartes.
 
  • #939
We can't find the missing link.

Or it has been found and is being hidden by the powers that be or the church people in some pretty high places still don't like the idea of evolution
 
  • #940
N468989 said:
To fully understand if we are, or not alone, we must first define what we understand by alone.
Beforehand, we must understand who we are, what is our meaning of existence (if there is such), and what is our purpose.

Why?
 
  • #941
DaveC426913 said:
Why?

Arm waving dualism FTW!
 
  • #942
Does it matter? The questions are always Who?What?When?Where?Why?How?

Let's be reasonable, if we had the answer this thread wouldn't even exist, more the less, if you had the answer you wouldn't give a damn so to speak. Give me your opinion instead of refuting/questioning my comments, they only my way of seeing things.

I understand the easy way out, to never answer a question is to ask another question. That's not our point here, so give me your opinion, without the facts.
 
  • #943
Fungi feeding on radiation
http://www.scienceagogo.com/news/20070422222547data_trunc_sys.shtml
"Just as the pigment chlorophyll converts sunlight into chemical energy that allows green plants to live and grow, our research suggests that melanin can use a different portion of the electromagnetic spectrum - ionizing radiation - to benefit the fungi containing it," said co-researcher Ekaterina Dadachova.

Investigating further, the researchers measured the electron spin resonance signal after melanin was exposed to ionizing radiation and found that radiation interacts with melanin to alter its electron structure. This, they believe, is an essential step for capturing radiation and converting it into a different form of energy to make food.

Metal Eating Bacteria
http://www.accessexcellence.org/WN/SU/bactercorrode.php

Bacteria live in clouds/snow
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=87761584&ps=rs

Facultative anaerobic Bacteria (able to live with and without oxygen present
http://www.springerlink.com/content/g2t215344n884160/

Bacteria that live on uranium
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/10/061019192814.htm
http://www.nanowerk.com/spotlight/spotid=765.php
http://blogs.discovery.com/news_sustainable/2009/09/radioactive_cleanup.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #944
I decided to delete the off-topic posts and leave only the references provided. Let's refrain from personal theories about how bacterial or viral life might survive in space and reference only published papers.

thread open.
 
Last edited:
  • #945
Its always going to be classified as swamp gas..

http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/10/aaah.jpg



There must be some way to identify if swamp gas is extraterrestrial or not.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #946
Heh, the swamp gas explanation was an admitted dodge. That came from Hynek when he was still heading up Bluebook for the USAF. He later became a convert and the so-called father of modern ufology.


...not to say that swamp gas have never been the cause of a UFO report. Atmostpheric phenomena are certainly at least one class of UFOs.
 
  • #947
Ivan Seeking said:
Heh, the swamp gas explanation was an admitted dodge. That came from Hynek when he was still heading up Bluebook for the USAF. He later became a convert and the so-called father of modern ufology.


...not to say that swamp gas have never been the cause of a UFO report. Atmostpheric phenomena are certainly at least one class of UFOs.

Thanks Ivan. That's good news that Hynek went from totally nonconstructive criticism to investigation. Probably brought some brains to the whole deal.
 
  • #948
baywax said:
Its always going to be classified as swamp gas..

http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/10/aaah.jpg



There must be some way to identify if swamp gas is extraterrestrial or not.


That's really cool and really wild and most certainly very rare, but I don't see anything worth getting in a tizzy about.

It's an atmospheric phenomenon. The fact that I've never seen one like this doesn't make me hesitant at all to conclude that that's what it is. It might be a lens cloud, more commonly seen in clear skies. This one just happens to be in an overcast sky. I would guess that the bright ring is an area where the two air masses cause the clouds to get very thin and transparent, and the sun is shining through.

Absolutely, there are some unlikely factors contributing to its existence, but nothing outside the bounds of atmospheric phenomena is required to explain it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #949
Not sure if this has been brought up in this very long thread but:

Wouldn't it be a reasonable assumption that if aliens had sufficient technology to travel large interstellar distances, they would also have sufficient stealth technology to prevent us from detecting them? And furthermore that since they have no made effort to contact us, they have no interest in being detected?

In other words, doesn't it seem that it's very unlikely that aliens would be visiting us secretly but get accidentally detected as UFOs?
 
  • #950
Galteeth said:
In other words, doesn't it seem that it's very unlikely that aliens would be visiting us secretly but get accidentally detected as UFOs?

Wouldn't it be very unlikely that if aliens were secretly visiting us that their being detected as UFOs would make any difference?
 
  • #951
TurtleMeister said:
Wouldn't it be very unlikely that if aliens were secretly visiting us that their being detected as UFOs would make any difference?

No. If they were indifferent to detection and were visiting us, we would have more reliable evidence of them. If they are making some effort to shield themselves from detection, they would not be detected by random people, pilots, and radar but be undetectable by more substantive methods. In other words, if they were able to be seen by people, photographed, and detectable by radar, what are the odds that more reliable evidence of them wouldn't have turned up by now?
 
  • #952
TurtleMeister said:
Wouldn't it be very unlikely that if aliens were secretly visiting us that their being detected as UFOs would make any difference?

The difference would be that our behaviour would change toward pandemic panic and their observations of our natural state would be spoiled.
 
  • #953
Galteeth said:
No. If they were indifferent to detection and were visiting us, we would have more reliable evidence of them. If they are making some effort to shield themselves from detection, they would not be detected by random people, pilots, and radar but be undetectable by more substantive methods. In other words, if they were able to be seen by people, photographed, and detectable by radar, what are the odds that more reliable evidence of them wouldn't have turned up by now?

baywax said:
The difference would be that our behaviour would change toward pandemic panic and their observations of our natural state would be spoiled.

The point of my question was to emphasize that UFO's do not qualify as evidence. And the aliens would know that.

Conversation aboard alien craft:

alien1 to alien2: Should we really do this experiment. What about the Prime Directive? Will not the earthlings be able to detect us?

alien2 to alien1: Don't worry. We will look like swamp gas. And even if someone does see too much, who would believe them?
 
Last edited:
  • #954
We need to end this line of discussion as it is far too speculative. It is fair to say we cannot anticipate with confidence the motives or thought processes of any ET species, should they exist.

When we can explain the motives and actions of teenagers, then we can talk about ET. :biggrin:
 
  • #955
Ivan Seeking said:
We need to end this line of discussion as it is far too speculative. It is fair to say we cannot anticipate with confidence the motives or thought processes of any ET species, should they exist.

When we can explain the motives and actions of teenagers, then we can talk about ET
Sorry, my post was meant to be partly for humor.
 
  • #956
grudge.jpg


Anyone seen this? I had no idea the research goes as far back as 1949

http://www.nicap.org/waves/1949fullrep.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #957
baywax said:
grudge.jpg


Anyone seen this? I had no idea the research goes as far back as 1949

http://www.nicap.org/waves/1949fullrep.htm

Sure. The US government had to take the UFO threat pretty seriously. Keep in mind, this was the time of the cold war, where violations of US air space represented existential threats.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #958
baywax said:
grudge.jpg


Anyone seen this? I had no idea the research goes as far back as 1949

http://www.nicap.org/waves/1949fullrep.htm

Checkout the Napster at the top of the S&D main page. Project Sign began in 1947, before Grudge.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #959
How disheartening would it be to discover over millennia of searching for life that we are the first that has evolved from the galaxy. The possibility is there.
 
  • #960
Blenton said:
How disheartening would it be to discover over millennia of searching for life that we are the first that has evolved from the galaxy. The possibility is there.

If you think of our existence as a 10,000 year cycle - how many comparable cycles are possible (& how long have permissable conditions existed somewhere in the Universe)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
8K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
10K