Is there really a black hole at the center of the Milky Way?

AI Thread Summary
Evidence suggests a black hole exists at the center of the Milky Way, based on the observed movement of stars near the core, attributed to gravitational effects from a black hole. The bright sphere often depicted at galactic centers is likely due to the high density of stars, which increases light intensity, necessitating the use of specific wavelengths like radio frequencies to study Sagittarius A*. The nature of this black hole, whether rotating or not, remains a complex issue in astrophysics, with debates on whether supermassive black holes or galaxies formed first. Various theories propose that black holes could have formed from the collapse of gas clouds or through the accretion of material over time. Ultimately, the relationship between black holes and galaxy formation continues to be a significant area of research.
klite
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
What leads us to believe that there is a black hole in the center of the milky way?
If there is one, why is the center of galaxies always depicted as being a bright sphere?
Is it a rotating black hole, and how would've it formed?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org


Let me format your post as a list of questions:

#1. What leads us to believe that there is a black hole in the center of the milky way?

Studies directed at the center of the galaxy have shown interesting behavior in the movement of stars close to the core. They then realized the cause of the orbital movement of the stars must have been due to a BH. The specific observations made can be readily found in the wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagittarius_A*

#2. If there is one, why is the center of galaxies always depicted as being a bright sphere?

I think you're referring to galactic haloes or bulges? The density of stars as we get closer to the center of the galaxy is larger and so the intensity should increase. In fact in order to study sag A you would have to find a wavelength that can penetrate the dust gas and stars closer to the center. I believe they used radio frequencies for this.

#3. Is it a rotating black hole, and how would've it formed?

This is one of the biggest puzzles in astrophysics and in fact I remember doing a paper about it in high school. It's the chicken and egg theory, which I'm sure you know "Which came first, the chicken or the egg?".

Well in this case the question becomes "Which came first, supermassive black holes, or galaxies".

There are a few theories regarding this. One of them obviously involves a black hole of a normal size (> 8 solar masses but < 100,000 solar masses) that has accreted material slowly over time. Another is the collapse of a giant cloud of gas into a star of super massive size which is so unstable that it becomes a SMBH sans the normal nucleosynthesis and supernova processes. There's also the theory of black holes that formed shortly after the big bang due to the high density of matter in that period.

For each of these cases the galaxy came second, meaning that once the SMBH had formed, it had accreted material around it that eventually formed into a galaxy.

The other theory obviously is the formation of a galaxy as one would think, but with a high density of stars near the core that cause a massive collision and collapse into an SMBH.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top