Is There Research on Using Hydrogen and Isotopes to Prepare Other Elements?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CaptCoonoor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Element Hydrogen
AI Thread Summary
Hydrogen is not the only element; it is defined by having one proton, and adding protons transforms it into other elements like helium. Research on the synthesis of elements indicates that most are formed through stellar nucleosynthesis, where hydrogen and helium serve as starting points. However, the creation of elements involves fusing protons and neutrons rather than solely relying on hydrogen. The premise that all elements can be prepared solely from hydrogen is inaccurate. The discussion has concluded, affirming that the synthesis of elements is a complex process beyond just hydrogen.
CaptCoonoor
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hydrogen is the only element and all the other elemnts can be prepared thru hydrogen and isotopes of hydrogen, is there any research paper on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi @CaptCoonoor

There's unlikely to be any papers in the way you've stated your premise as it's inaccurate; isotopes of Hydrogen (or any atom) only have additional neutrons; once you give it an additional Proton it ceases to be Hydrogen and becomes Helium - so Hydrogen isn't the only element

If you google nucleosynthesis you'll get links to how every element in the universe is originally made from Hydrogen/Helium, which may well be more in line with what you are asking
 
CaptCoonoor said:
Hydrogen is the only element

Re-read the definition of an element and you should immediately see that this is incorrect.
From here: http://goldbook.iupac.org/C01022.html

chemical element
  1. A species of atoms; all atoms with the same number of protons in the atomic nucleus.
  2. A pure chemical substance composed of atoms with the same number of protons in the atomic nucleus. Sometimes this concept is called the elementary substance as distinct from the chemical element as defined under 1, but mostly the term chemical element is used for both concepts.
By definition there is more than one chemical element.

and all the other elemnts can be prepared thru hydrogen and isotopes of hydrogen, is there any research paper on this?

This really isn't correct, but it is more accurate than your previous statement. In nature, the synthesis of most new elements takes place inside of stars through what is known as stellar nucleosynthesis. While the entire chain of newly created elements does start at hydrogen, to say that they are made from hydrogen is probably not the best way of saying it. All elements other than hydrogen-1 (protium) result from fusing together some number of protons and neutrons or from the decay of existing elements. Protons and neutrons are the basic parts that make up any element, so it's more accurate to say that all elements are created from these instead of saying that they are created from hydrogen.
 
The question has been asked and answered, so the thread is now closed.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top