Is thermal conductivity additive for multiple layers of different materials?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether thermal conductivity is additive for multiple layers of different materials. One participant suggests that the total thermal conductivity resembles the behavior of capacitors in series, implying it cannot exceed the lowest individual conductivity. Another participant counters this by comparing thermal conductivity to resistors, noting that conductivity is the inverse of resistance. They propose a formula for calculating total conductivity based on individual layer conductivities. The conversation highlights the complexity of modeling thermal conductivity in layered materials.
Xeract
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I think the answer is yes, but I just wanted to check.

If you have several sheets of different material, is the total thermal conductivity the sum of the individual thermal conductivities?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you're wrong. The conductivity of the laminate is more like the capacitance of capacitors in series. The total conductivity can't be more than the lowest value in the laminate.
 
I was modelling the conductivity on resistors instead of capacitors. Surely the higher the thermal conductivity the higher the "resistance" to heat flow so they should be modeled as resistors?

(I could be completely wrong on this)
 
You're right about the resistors. But conductivity is the inverse of resistance,
so the addition ( for equal thickness layers) looks like,

\frac{1}{C_{tot}} = \sum \frac{1}{C_i}

which reminds me of capacitors. I could also be wrong.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top