Is this a reliable way to measure an arc

  • Thread starter Thread starter camacru
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arc Measure
camacru
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I have a brass rod with a 90 degree bend. I want to measure the outer and inner radii by placing a piece of string along both of them, and then straightening the string out to determine the linear measurement. Is this an accurate method?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Reliable? Yes (depending on how well you keep the "string" on the line of the outer radius).

Accurate? No. At least not to the tolerances you stated in your previous post, if that's what you're getting at. But feel free to try. I'll bet you get a different measurement each time.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=2411590&postcount=1
 
That's what I thought. What would be a more accurate method? I thought about using a graduated flexible curve...
 
Why don't you measure the volume of the bent piece (say, by submerging it underwater in a big graduated cylinder). Then calculate the length of an unbent rod with the same volume.

Or, if you know the density, simply calculate the length of unbent rod that has the same weight as your bent piece.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top