Is this a reliable way to measure an arc

  • Thread starter Thread starter camacru
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arc Measure
AI Thread Summary
Measuring the outer and inner radii of a bent brass rod using string is not a reliable method, as it may yield inconsistent results. While it can provide a rough estimate, the accuracy is limited, especially for precise tolerances. A more accurate approach suggested includes measuring the volume of the bent rod by submerging it in water and calculating the length of an unbent rod with the same volume. Alternatively, knowing the density allows for calculating the length of an unbent rod that matches the weight of the bent piece. These methods offer greater precision for measuring the arc.
camacru
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I have a brass rod with a 90 degree bend. I want to measure the outer and inner radii by placing a piece of string along both of them, and then straightening the string out to determine the linear measurement. Is this an accurate method?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Reliable? Yes (depending on how well you keep the "string" on the line of the outer radius).

Accurate? No. At least not to the tolerances you stated in your previous post, if that's what you're getting at. But feel free to try. I'll bet you get a different measurement each time.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=2411590&postcount=1
 
That's what I thought. What would be a more accurate method? I thought about using a graduated flexible curve...
 
Why don't you measure the volume of the bent piece (say, by submerging it underwater in a big graduated cylinder). Then calculate the length of an unbent rod with the same volume.

Or, if you know the density, simply calculate the length of unbent rod that has the same weight as your bent piece.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top