Is this a true statement regarding labeling tension & pulley?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobaustin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulley Tension
AI Thread Summary
If a pulley is massless, the tension (T) on both sides is equal. However, if the pulley has mass, the tensions must be labeled differently as T1 and T2 due to the torque created by the mass. In scenarios involving frictionless pulleys, the same principle applies, but the analysis changes when considering the pulley’s moment of inertia (I) and radius (r). When the pulley has mass, the net torque results in different tensions on either side. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurately calculating the acceleration of the system.
bobaustin
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
If the pulley is massless then the tension T on one side of the pulley is the same T as on the other side, therefore it's the exact same T.
But if the pulley is not massless then you have to label one T1, say, and the other T2, even it's the same rope?
Same situation if the pulley is frictionless?

Thanks -
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tension on both segments are the same. But when you want to find the acceleration of the system, you have to consider the torque on the pulley.
 
But if you can't ignore the pulley then the tension on one side is different than the other side, right? For example if you have a ("low friction") Atwood machine, the T is the same on both sides which is why you get a = (m2-m1)g/(m1+m2) etc, but in a problem where they talk about the pulley being a disk with I and r, and or if they specify that there is a frictional torque, then you have to label the tensions differently?
 
Yes.

If the pulley has nonzero mass, I is not zero and there can be a net torque on it due to different tensions.

If the pulley is massless, I=0, and therefore the torque,

T = Iα

is zero as well. In order to have zero torque, the two tensions must be equal.
 
Redbelly98: Thanks for a great explanation that makes perfect sense!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top