Is this correct?Solved: Magnitude of Net Gravitational Force on Mass in Square

  • Thread starter Thread starter huh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitation Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the net gravitational force on one mass in a square arrangement of four identical 600 kg masses. The correct approach involves using the law of gravitation and superposition of forces, accounting for vector components. Initial calculations mistakenly halved the distance for the diagonal mass, leading to incorrect force values. The correct method involves using Pythagorean theorem to determine the diagonal distance and applying trigonometric functions for accurate vector components. Ultimately, the revised calculations yield a net gravitational force of approximately 2.35 x 10^-3 N.
huh
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
law of gravitation- is this better?

Could someone check this please?

Four identical masses of mass 600 kg each are placed at the corners of a square whose side lengths are 14.0cm (.14m).

What is the magnitude of the net gravitational force on one of the masses, due to the other three?

It's asking for the absolute value of the force.

Ok so the equation to use is (GMm)/r^2

And superposition of forces should be used, correct?

This is what I am trying: for the mass in the upper left hand corner
G= 6.67 x 10^-11

(G*600*600)/(.14^2)= 1.23 x 10^-3 for the masses beside and below

(G*600*600)/(.07^2)= 4.90 x 10^-3 for the mass diagonal from the one used
(.07 because the attraction would decrease by half, right?)

So adding these together:
(2)(1.23 x 10^-3) + 4.90 x 10^-3= 7.35 x 10^-3

or
(1.23 x 10^-3)+(-1.23 x 10^-3)+ 4.90 x 10^-3 = 4.90 x 10^-3
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to break them up into x and y-axis components, add those, then use Pythagoras to add them back up.
 
huh said:
(G*600*600)/(.07^2)= 4.90 x 10^-3 for the mass diagonal from the one used
(.07 because the attraction would decrease by half, right?)

I'm not sure of your reasoning here.

I would calculate the new distance by pythagoras and use that.

You're right - the attaraction DOES half, but you've used that fact to half your distance, squared your distance and substitued it into the equation which has given you a GREATER force for that diagonal one... which can't be right!

Also remember when you add, you're adding vectors.
 
Okay let's try again:

(G*600*600)/(.14^2)= 1.23 x 10^-3 for the masses beside and below

use cos(0) and sin(0)
x-component: 1.23 x 10^-3 y-component: 0
use cos(90) and sin(90)
x-comp: 0 y-comp: 1.23 x 10^-3

(G*600*600)/[(.14^2)+(.14^2)]= 6.13 x 10^-4 for the mass diagonal from the one used
(I saw something like this denominator in an example I found)
use cosine and sine of 45 degrees
x and y-comp: 4.33 x 10^-4

So adding these together:
F(x)=0 + 1.23 x 10^-3 + 4.33 x 10^-4 = 1.66 x 10^-3
F(y)=4.33 x 10^-4 + 1.23 x 10^-3

using pythagorean theorem:
2.35 x 10^-3
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top