Is this equation for acceleration on this website wrong?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Physicsy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
Physicsy
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Greetings, I've been learning the mathematics of classical physics from a website called "A physiscs teacher" (http://aphysicsteacher.blogspot.com/search/label/acceleration). While looking through the equations on the acceleration i think i found a mistake made by the website.

A bus starts from rest and accelerates at a rate of 2.5 m/s2 for a time of 50 s. Determine the distance traveled by the bus during the acceleration phase.

Now let us identify the different variables involved.

u the initial speed = 0 m/s

t time taken = 50 s

a acceleration = 2.5 m/s2

s distance traveled = ?

If we want calculate s the distance traveled we will have to use the second equation of motion

S = ut + 1/2at2

Substituting the different values we get

S = ut + 1/2at(squared)

= o*50 + 0.5 *50(squared)

= 0 + 0.5*2500

=1250 m

My problem with this question comes in when after the values have been substituated.
= o*50 + 0.5 *50(squared), I am kinda new to the mathematical side of physics but shouldn't the acceleration (2.5) have been substituated in as well to make it
= o*50 + 0.5 *2.5 *50(squared) get an answer of 3125?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If
a=2.5 m/s²
t=50s
u=0
then
s = ut + ½at²
s = 0 + ½ x 2.5 x 50²
s = 3125m
 
Physicsy said:
S = ut + 1/2at(squared)
OK.

= o*50 + 0.5 *50(squared)
Oops!


My problem with this question comes in when after the values have been substituated.
= o*50 + 0.5 *50(squared), I am kinda new to the mathematical side of physics but shouldn't the acceleration (2.5) have been substituated in as well to make it
= o*50 + 0.5 *2.5 *50(squared) get an answer of 3125?
Of course. The webpage goofed in leaving out the acceleration. (It was obviously an oversight.) Send the author an email suggesting that he correct the page! He will appreciate the correction.

Good catch. :wink: