Is This Equation Solvable: 2*x^2*(x-2)^2 = x+1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter haiha
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation 2*x^2*(x-2)^2 = x+1 can be solved by simplifying it through algebraic manipulations, such as multiplying out brackets and collecting like terms. This process will lead to a third-order polynomial equation, which can be solved using known formulas for cubic equations. There is a simple root that can be identified by inspection or by graphing the function. Once this root is found, it can be factored out, allowing for the resolution of the remaining second-order polynomial. The discussion emphasizes the importance of algebraic techniques in solving complex equations.
haiha
Messages
136
Reaction score
1
My friend asks me to solve this one, but i have no idea :

2*x^2*(x-2)^2 = x+1.

Thanks for any hints.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
When you have a complicated-looking equation, you should use whatever knowledge you have of algebraic manipulations, to simplify it.

Multiply out brackets... collect like terms... eventually you'll be able to put it into a form that you recognise.

Also I think your question should go in the homework forums.

ETA: huh, I thought that '*' in the middle of the LHS was a '+'. Your version looks harder! Never mind, try simplifying anyway.
 
Last edited:
You advice still stands - multiply out and factor. Notice that there is a root you can spot from the original form by inspection.
 
If you wrote the equation without mistake: 2*x^2*(x-2)^2 = x+1 ,
then a few simple calculations will lead you to a third order equation, and there are formulas for solving analtically a third order polynimial equation.

However, as matt_grime said, there is one root that is easy to find: just try a few numbers, or make a graphic of the function to guess what is this simple root.

Once you have found this simple root, you can indeed factor it out by division and solve the second order polynomial that still remains.
 
Thanks for all the helps. I will try it. Anyway, it is not a homework for sure.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top