Is This Equation Valid? Analyzing the RHS

  • Thread starter Thread starter tetris11
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The equation Axy = BzzBxz + CxyBxyBxy is invalid due to the differing index structures of the terms on the right-hand side (RHS). The user identifies that the terms BzzBxz and CxyBxyBxy cannot be combined because they do not share the same indices. Furthermore, the discussion highlights the importance of understanding implicit contractions in notation, as demonstrated by the examples provided, which suggest that proper contraction rules must be applied for the equation to hold validity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor notation and index structures
  • Familiarity with contraction rules in tensor algebra
  • Knowledge of mathematical grammar related to indices
  • Basic principles of linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Research tensor contraction rules in advanced linear algebra
  • Study the implications of index notation in physics and mathematics
  • Explore examples of valid and invalid tensor equations
  • Learn about the significance of index structure in tensor calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are dealing with tensor equations and require a deeper understanding of index notation and contraction rules.

tetris11
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Is this equation valid?

Axy = BzzBxz+ CxyBxyBxy


The Attempt at a Solution



BzzBxz = Bzxz+z (I think)

CxyBxyBxy = Jxy2xy (I think)

so Axy = Bzxz+z + Jxy2xy

My reasoning:
Since the two terms on the RHS do not share the same index structure, they cannot be added, and they do not share the same index structure with the LHS either.

So this equation is not possible, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem with the equation is the serious grammatical error with the indices.

Assuming they were filled in correctly, it would depend upon what contractions were implicit in the notation. For example, the following is meaningful:
Axy = BzyCxz + Duv Exy Fuv
 
I don't really follow.
How does that contract?

In your example, would Fuv contract to something like Jk
And then would Bz contract to L (no upper indices?)

Would it be valid to say DuvExyFuv would contract to something like Jkab?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K