Solve 5^x=2x+1 or Prove Impossibility

  • Thread starter Thread starter Little ant
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation 5^x = 2x + 1 can be approached by examining the function y = (5^x) - (2x + 1), which indicates the presence of two roots, one of which is x = 0. Graphing this function helps approximate the second root, which can then be refined using numerical methods like Newton-Raphson. Analytical solutions are not feasible with ordinary methods and require the Lambert W function for resolution. The discussion emphasizes the importance of numerical computation for finding accurate solutions. Ultimately, while one solution is easily identified, the existence of a second solution necessitates advanced techniques.
Little ant
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Find the solutions of 5^x=2x+1 by ordinary methods? if it can´t be found by these ways, then prove that it's imposible.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It depends on what you mean by ordinary methods.

By inspection, x=0.
 
but, there is other answer, how you find it?
 
The exponent ^5 is behind the X or after?
 
Ordinary method consists in studying the function y=(5^x)-(2x+1)
This shows that two roots exist (one of them is obvious).
Drawing the graph of the function allows to obtain a first approximate of the second root.
Then, numerical computation leads to the value of the root, as accurate as we want. There are a lot of numerical methods : Newton-Raphson and many other...
Analytical solving is outside the scope of ordinary methods. It requires the use of a special function : the Lambert W function.
 

Attachments

  • Graph.JPG
    Graph.JPG
    41.9 KB · Views: 414
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top