Is this just a typo in Schutz' book on General Relativity?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a potential typo in Schutz's book on General Relativity, specifically regarding the description of components of four-acceleration in the context of momentarily comoving inertial frames (MCRF). Participants explore whether the phrasing in the text is accurate or misleading.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if the text should state "a non-zero component" instead of the current phrasing.
  • Another participant asserts that the book is correct, explaining that in the MCRF, the time component of the four-acceleration is indeed zero.
  • A different participant clarifies that in the MCRF, the only non-zero component of the four-velocity is the zeroth one, leading to the conclusion about the four-acceleration's form.
  • One participant expresses agreement with the clarification but notes that the original text could have been clearer by specifying that the four-velocity has only a zeroth component.
  • Another participant shares their broader confusion with Schutz's writing, suggesting that while the physics is sound, the editing could be improved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the original text contains a typo. Some defend the text as correct, while others express confusion and suggest it could be clearer.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the phrasing in the book may lead to misunderstandings, particularly regarding the interpretation of components in the MCRF.

Ahmed1029
Messages
109
Reaction score
40
I'm wondering is I'm missing something, or this should be " a non-zero component"?
Screenshot_2022-12-06-19-25-32-84_e2d5b3f32b79de1d45acd1fad96fbb0f.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The book is correct. In the momentarily comoving inertial frame the time component of the four-acceleration is indeed 0.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: malawi_glenn and Ahmed1029
No, it means that in the MCRF the only non-zero component of ##\tilde{U}## is the zeroth one (because the three velocity is zero by definition in that frame). Hence the four acceleration (which he's just proved is orthogonal to ##\tilde{U}##) must take the form given.

I agree it's not particularly clearly written - it would be better if he'd said "##\tilde{U}## has only a ##{\tilde{U}}^0## component".
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SiennaTheGr8, vanhees71, Dale and 1 other person
Ah yes, it's clear now. I thought he meant that it had only one component taking the value zero, which didn't make sense.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Ibix
I must say this isn't the only thing I've found confusing in Schutz. The physics is sound enough, but I do feel like he really needed a better editor.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Ahmed1029

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K