Is This Proof that 1=2 Valid or Fallacious?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Enjoicube
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Discrete Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a proof claiming that if there exists a real number x such that (x^2) - x - 2 = (x^2) - 4, then it leads to the conclusion that 1 = 2. The proof is fallacious primarily due to the division by (x - 2), which is invalid when x equals 2, as this results in division by zero. Participants emphasize that the hypothesis is indeed true, but the error occurs in the manipulation of the equation. The conversation highlights the importance of recognizing the implications of dividing by terms that can equal zero in mathematical proofs. Ultimately, the proof fails because it violates fundamental rules of algebra.
Enjoicube
Messages
48
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Alright here it is:

Theorem: if there exists an x belonging to reals such that (x^2)-x-2=(x^2)-4 then 1=2.

Remark: note that there is such an x belonging to reals.

Proof:

1) by hypothesis assume there exists an X belonging to reals such that (x^2)-x-2=(x^2)-4

2)factor each side,

3)resulting in (x-2)(x+1)=(x-2)(x+2)

4)divide each side by (x-2),

5)resulting in x+1=x+2

6)subtract x from each side, resulting in 1=2

1) What terminology (quantifiers, predicates) can be used to express the entire statements 1,3,5

2)Why is this proof fallacious, refer to statements by their numbers. Hint: What are the domains for each statement?



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, my attempt at part one (is
Theorem: (\existsX \in\Re) \right arrow ((x^2)-x-2=(x^2)-4))

Statement 1: \existsX \in\Re ((x^2)-x-2=(x^2)-4))

Statement 3:\existsX \in\Re(x-2)(x+1)=(x-2)(x+2)

Statement 5:\existsX \in\Rex+1=x+2

For part 2, i am quite lost, the problem is the use of existential quantifier. My guess is a division by zero somewhere, but otherwise, I need a bigger hint.

Homework Statement


 
Physics news on Phys.org
Enjoicube said:

Homework Statement


Alright here it is:

Theorem: if there exists an x belonging to reals such that (x^2)-x-2=(x^2)-4 then 1=2.

Remark: note that there is such an x belonging to reals.

Proof:

1) by hypothesis assume there exists an X belonging to reals such that (x^2)-x-2=(x^2)-4

2)factor each side,

3)resulting in (x-2)(x+1)=(x-2)(x+2)

4)divide each side by (x-2),

5)resulting in x+1=x+2

6)subtract x from each side, resulting in 1=2

1) What terminology (quantifiers, predicates) can be used to express the entire statements 1,3,5

2)Why is this proof fallacious, refer to statements by their numbers. Hint: What are the domains for each statement?



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, my attempt at part one (is
Theorem: (\existsX \in\Re) \right arrow ((x^2)-x-2=(x^2)-4))

Statement 1: \existsX \in\Re ((x^2)-x-2=(x^2)-4))

Statement 3:\existsX \in\Re(x-2)(x+1)=(x-2)(x+2)

Statement 5:\existsX \in\Rex+1=x+2

For part 2, i am quite lost, the problem is the use of existential quantifier. My guess is a division by zero somewhere, but otherwise, I need a bigger hint.

Homework Statement

The theorem starts "there exists an X belonging to reals such that (x^2)-x-2=(x^2)-4". Okay, is that true? If not then the conclusion is false because the hypothesis is false! If it is true, what is that x? In other words, solve x^2- x- 2= x^2- 4. I will tell you right now that the hypothesis is true but once you have determined what that x is, you will see why dividing both sides of the equation by x- 2 is an error.
 
Aha! got it. Thank you so much for that. In retrospect I really should have noticed this x value.
 
In retrospect, I should have been a genius!
 
Actually, in logic, when there are several hypotheses, if any single hypothesis is false the implication (hypotheses imply conclusion) is always true, simply by the nature of the formal definition of a valid argument.

the problem with this "proof" is simply that dividing by x-2 is division by zero, since 2 is a solution to x^2 - x -2 = x^4 - 4
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top