Is transitioning from chemical to nuclear engineering a good idea?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the decision of whether to pursue a bachelor's degree in chemical engineering or nuclear engineering, particularly for someone planning to obtain a master's in nuclear engineering. Participants explore the implications of tuition costs, potential job market outcomes, and the relevance of undergraduate education to future studies and career paths in nuclear engineering.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about the financial implications of out-of-state tuition for nuclear engineering versus in-state tuition for chemical engineering.
  • Some participants suggest that pursuing a bachelor's in nuclear engineering may provide a stronger foundation for a master's in the same field, while others argue that a chemical engineering background could also be beneficial, especially for those interested in the chemical aspects of nuclear systems.
  • There is mention of the possibility of taking remedial courses in nuclear reactor physics during graduate studies if one chooses a chemical engineering undergraduate program.
  • Another participant highlights the option of minoring in chemical engineering while majoring in nuclear engineering at NC State, suggesting a hybrid approach could be advantageous.
  • Concerns about age and debt are raised, with one participant feeling that being 26 years old adds pressure to make the right educational choice.
  • One participant notes that out-of-state tuition at NC State may not be significantly higher than in-state tuition at Clemson, which could influence the decision-making process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether a bachelor's in nuclear engineering is definitively better than one in chemical engineering for future job prospects or graduate studies. Multiple competing views remain regarding the best educational path.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the long-term benefits of each degree path and the impact of financial considerations on their decisions. The discussion reflects a variety of personal circumstances and priorities that may influence individual choices.

DL Mckinney
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I’d like to be a nuclear engineer. I live in South Carolina and I’ve been accepted into Clemson for chemical engineering and also NC State for nuclear. I hear a lot of people have gotten their bachelors in something else and then get their masters in nuclear.

Since I plan on getting a masters in nuclear engineering anyway I'm not sure if it’s worth taking on the increased debt of out of state tuition. At 26, I feel really old to be doing a bachelors degree and the debt is a much bigger concern at my age than it would be if I were 18.

So, is it worth it? Would I be at that big of a disadvantage if I got my bachelors in chemical or would there be enough of a benefit from the bachelors in nuclear to make it worth the extra debt? Would it be more difficult landing a job with the bachelors in chemical? It’s right down to the wire now but I still have a couple of days to change my mind.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Clemson and NCSU are both good schools for engineering.

As to whether one should major in Chem E or Nuc E, that's a personal decision. If one is going on to a graduate program in Nuc E, then it probably would be a good idea to do an undergrad program in NE, in order to get the nuclear courses.

If one is more interested in the chemical engineering aspects of nuclear systems, then one might consider a Chem Eng undergraduate program, and then one could take some remedial courses, typically in nuclear reactor physics during the graduate program.

Of course, one could do undergrad in NucE and take Chem Eng courses. I'd recommend comparing the Chem Eng programs at Clemson and NCSU.

University of SC in Columbia has a small nuclear engineering program.
http://www.me.sc.edu/nuclear/
 
DL Mckinney said:
I’d like to be a nuclear engineer. I live in South Carolina and I’ve been accepted into Clemson for chemical engineering and also NC State for nuclear. I hear a lot of people have gotten their bachelors in something else and then get their masters in nuclear.

Since I plan on getting a masters in nuclear engineering anyway I'm not sure if it’s worth taking on the increased debt of out of state tuition. At 26, I feel really old to be doing a bachelors degree and the debt is a much bigger concern at my age than it would be if I were 18.

So, is it worth it? Would I be at that big of a disadvantage if I got my bachelors in chemical or would there be enough of a benefit from the bachelors in nuclear to make it worth the extra debt? Would it be more difficult landing a job with the bachelors in chemical? It’s right down to the wire now but I still have a couple of days to change my mind.


Well NC States Nuclear program is pretty good from what I have heard(I go there). I don't know if you knew this, but they offer a minor in chemical engineering. You could do Nuclear and take some chemE classes that your interested in/or could help out with the Nuclear stuff. Like Astro said, if you plan on doing a M.S. in Nuclear, you might as well do it for undergrad. It will make things easier for you.
 
Thanks for the replies. The only real reason I was considering Chem E was the cost of out of state tuition.

After spending more time going back and forth with the aid offices at both schools it seems out of state tuition at NC State will not be that much more than in state tuition at Clemson.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K