Is Travel to Parallel Universes Just a Myth or a Real Possibility?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the possibility of traveling to parallel universes and the implications such travel may have on the laws of conservation of energy, mass, and information. Participants explore the theoretical aspects of this concept, questioning its feasibility and the scientific validity of claims made in popular media.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether traveling to parallel universes violates the laws of conservation of energy, mass, and information, suggesting that such travel could imply a loss of mass from one universe and a creation of mass in another.
  • Others argue that the laws of conservation apply only to our current understanding of the universe, implying that speculation about parallel universes may not adhere to these laws.
  • Concerns are raised about the simplification of complex scientific topics in popular media, with some participants expressing skepticism about the credibility of claims made in shows like those on the History Channel.
  • There is a suggestion that the concept of parallel universes is purely hypothetical and speculative, with no current evidence supporting their existence.
  • Participants express frustration over the portrayal of scientific concepts in media, feeling that it may mislead the public and undermine serious scientific discourse.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not reach a consensus on the feasibility of traveling to parallel universes. Multiple competing views remain regarding the implications of conservation laws and the validity of claims made in popular science media.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the limitations of popular science representations, noting that they often fail to address the complexities and nuances of conservation laws and theoretical physics.

earamsey
Messages
39
Reaction score
1
I was watching a show called "http://www.history.com/shows.do?action=detail&episodeId=373152" " on History Channel. It is claimed that someday it may be possible to travel to parallel universes. Does this not violate law of conservation of energy, mass and information? Would this action essentially be subtracting mass, destroying, from this universe and, adding, creating mass, in another? Also, once information left this universe, there would be no way to reconstruct it -- Information is Lost. I know how hard "Mr. Leonard Susskind Ph.D." argued against such phenomena with "Mr. Stephen Hawking Ph.D." on this.

Is it a case of overly simplifying the subjecvt to the point that it doesn't make any sense; as per usual on History, Discovery and Discovery Science Channels? Or am I in error and there is no conservation issue related to traveling to parallel universes (and say the traveller died there and did not return?)

Would the conversation be shared between the universes? Should Conversation be extended to parallel universes?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
earamsey said:
Is it a case of overly simplifying to point that it doesn't make any sense; as per usual on History, Discovery and Discovery Science Channels?
It's more a case of wild speculation.

The laws of conservation really only apply to the universe as we understand it. Speculate beyond that and you'll be writing new rules as you go.
 
earamsey said:
It is claimed that someday it may be possible to travel to parallel universes. Does this not violate law of conservation of energy, mass and information?
I like the FAQ http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/GR/energy_gr.html" . It does a good job of treating a very complicated subject at a fairly basic level.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
DaveC426913 said:
It's more a case of wild speculation.

The laws of conservation really only apply to the universe as we understand it. Speculate beyond that and you'll be writing new rules as you go.
So, are you saying that travel to Parallel Universes may be highly unlikely because they violate conservation laws? I would feel better if this is the case else they appear to rewriting the rules.

Should I complain about this show because i feel it is presenting incredulous information. There was no attempt to explain complications of conversavation laws. I once thought the scientists in this series were high knowledgeable but now I don't know. Or perhaps they feel they can get away with fairy tales because they feel the general public is dumb. I wish a bunch of ppl would write them about this I like to watch science documentaries but this was more sci fi. I truly loved "The Elegant Universe" series on nova they explained the gotchas and talked to viewers as if they had at least a moist green pea for a brain. :(
 
Last edited:
earamsey said:
So, are you saying that travel to Parallel Universes may be highly unlikely because they violate conservation laws?
No, I'm saying that travel to Parallel Universes may be highly unlikely because they don't currently exist; they are purely hypothetical - a matter of complete speculation.

earamsey said:
I would feel better if this is the case else they appear to rewriting the rules. Should I complain about this show because i feel it is spreading information as without regards to basics and renders the entire episode and perhaps even the physicists in it incredulous :(
That's pop TV for ya. Welcome to the 21st century. I weep for the future.

P.S. you mean 'incredible'. 'Incredulous' is a human reaction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
8K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K