Is \( u^p \) a root of \( f(x) \) over \( GF(p) \) if \( u \) is a root?

  • Thread starter Thread starter joeblow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomials Roots
joeblow
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
If F is a field of characteristic p, with prime subfield K = GF(p) and u in F is a root of f(x) (over K), then u^p is a root of f(x).

Now, I know that x^p \equiv x (\text{mod } p), so isn't it immediately true that f(x^p)=f(x) (over K)? So, 0=f(u)=f(u^p).

I only ask because this type of problem (as I understand it) is much more elementary than the material that the text is covering. In the section from which this problem comes, the main results are (1) that if F = GF(q), then the irreducible factors of x^{q^{m}}-x over F are precisely the irreducible polynomials over F of degree dividing m, (2) the Mobius inversion formula, and (3) a formula for finding the number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree m over GF(q).

Please tell me if there is some critical misunderstanding that I am having.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general, we don't have f(u)=f(up) in your field F, but only for u in K, and you also need to use that (a+b)p=ap+bp for any a,b in F. Then it should be easy and fun to write out 0=f(u)p and see where that leads.
 
The result that (a+b)^p=a^p+b^p (which is all that is needed) was demonstrated (via exercise) much earlier in the chapter, though. Something is strange about the placement of this problem.
 
It is true that, for every element a of GF(p), we have a^p = a. As a consequence, it's also true that, for every integer n, we have n^p \equiv n \pmod p. Also as a consequence, for every polynomial with coefficients from GF(p) and element a of GF(p), we have f(a) = f(a^p). Similarly, for every polynomial with integer coefficients and any integer n, we have f(n^p) \equiv f(n) \pmod p.

(Yes, I mean = where I've written =, and \equiv where I've written \equiv)If x is an indeterminate over GF(p), then it's not true that x^p = x. Consequently, if t is an indeterminate over Z, it's not true that t^p \equiv t \pmod p.

(While x and x^p both determine the same function on GF(p), they are different polynomials. And, e.g., they give different functions on GF(p^2))If u \notin \text{GF}(p), then we have no reason to expect u^p = u. If u is not an integer, we have no reason to expect u^p \equiv p \pmod p (if that equation even makes sense).For a finite field \text{GF}(p^e), the operation a \mapsto a^p is actually generalization of the idea of conjugation. For the special case of e = 2, you even have that (a^p)^p = a. (for larger e, you have to iterate e times rather than just twice)
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top