Is unemployment necessary for a functioning economy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kasse
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the paradox of labor scarcity despite the abundance of work that needs to be done across various sectors, such as maintenance, repair, and construction. It points out that while there are millions of unemployed individuals in industrial countries, particularly in the U.S., this situation is not solely due to a lack of available jobs. Factors such as government regulation, economic health, and the relationship between unemployment and inflation are questioned. The conversation suggests that unemployment may stem more from a lack of funds to pay for labor rather than an absence of work. Observations indicate that wealthier neighborhoods tend to have cleaner streets and lower unemployment rates, suggesting that labor operates under market dynamics of supply and demand. The discussion also notes that some unemployment is voluntary, while skill mismatches and financial constraints faced by employers contribute to the issue. Overall, it emphasizes that achieving 0% unemployment is unrealistic within the current economic framework.
kasse
Messages
383
Reaction score
1
Wherever we are and wherever we look, there is work to be done, work for our subsistence and well-being, for food, shelter, clothing and countless other wants, to build and create, or just to clean and maintain. Labor, though, is scarcer by tar than tools and equipment. Just visit a workshop, factory, office or construction site. There, expensive equipment is used for a few minutes of hours only, standing idle most of the time. Or just walk through the streets of most cities; they cry out for labor to clean and maintain, to repair and rebuild.

Yet millions of workers in the industrial countries are unemployed. Some seven to eight million Americans always are normally unemployed, many more during periods of stagnation and decline.

Why is this? Is it because of government regulation? Is a certain degree of unemployment healthy for the economy, after all? Is it true that 0% unemployment would allow the workers to push their wages up, thereby creating inflation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kasse said:
Wherever we are and wherever we look, there is work to be done, work for our subsistence and well-being, for food, shelter, clothing and countless other wants, to build and create, or just to clean and maintain.

Do you see piles of money lying around to pay for this work while you're looking?

Just visit a workshop, factory, office or construction site. There, expensive equipment is used for a few minutes of hours only, standing idle most of the time.

You should visit more workshops, factories and construction sites then. This statement is wrong.

Or just walk through the streets of most cities; they cry out for labor to clean and maintain, to repair and rebuild.

DC is nice, clean and well maintained to me.

Why is this? Is it because of government regulation? Is a certain degree of unemployment healthy for the economy, after all? Is it true that 0% unemployment would allow the workers to push their wages up, thereby creating inflation?

Prehaps you should look online for a government study that looks into answering this question. It will give you more insight than speculative posts.
 
I don't think unemployment is so much an issue of lack of work that could be done but lack of funds to pay for the work to be done. If you go to a rich neighbourhood they will likely have rather clean streets and few unemployed people. Go to a poorer neighbourhood and you will likely find dirtier streets and more unemployed people.
 
Labor is a market like any other and as such it is subject to the rules of supply and demand. Unemployment is a natural consequence of that.
 
You cannot have 0% unemployment.
- Some people are voluntary unemployed. (Not a concern)
- Some people don't find right jobs .
- Companies fail to get people who have the right skills. (big concern)
- Some employers simply don't have enough money to pay workers (not a big concern)
 

Similar threads

Back
Top