Is US Fusion Energy Research at Risk Due to Budget Cuts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Khashishi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fusion Programs
AI Thread Summary
The President's 2013 budget proposal suggests reduced funding for U.S. fusion energy programs, with a significant portion directed towards the ITER project in France, leading to severe cuts in domestic initiatives. The shutdown of the Alcator C-mod tokamak at MIT, which has the highest magnetic field among current tokamaks, exemplifies the impact of these budget cuts. Domestic fusion programs are crucial for supporting ITER and advancing research necessary for fusion power generation. Awareness and lobbying efforts are emerging to advocate for increased funding in fusion research. Overall, the discussion highlights concerns that budget reductions could hinder progress in achieving viable fusion energy solutions.
Khashishi
Science Advisor
Messages
2,812
Reaction score
490
The President’s 2013 budget proposal has called for reduced funding of fusion energy programs. At the same time, an increasing portion of the fusion budget is allocated toward ITER, which is a large reactor being built in France, a collaborative effort between many countries. Funds for remaining programs are severely cut. One of the main tokamak experiments, Alcator C-mod at MIT, is slated to be shut down. Alcator C-mod has the highest magnetic field of current tokamaks and a large number of operating modes.

The domestic programs provide essential support for ITER (whose design is being updated based on researching coming out of these smaller devices). If we cut them, we are really slowing progress toward fusion power generation.

A few sites have popped up to raise some awareness and try to lobby Congress to allocate more funding for fusion research.
http://www.fusionfuture.org/
https://sites.google.com/site/plasmaphysicsletter2013/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
That's disheartening...I'll have to look into those websites as soon as I get home.
 
Khashishi said:
If we cut them, we are really slowing progress toward fusion power generation.

I can remember when I was a kid in school and we had a science talk about a wonderful new invention the UK had made that would generate electricity so cheaply that people could use as much as they wanted for free.

That was the AERE http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZETA_(fusion_reactor ) project, back in 1957.

Unless progress can go backwards from zero, it's kinda hard to see how it can go forwards any slower than the current rate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
AlephZero said:
I can remember when I was a kid in school and we had a science talk about a wonderful new invention the UK had made that would generate electricity so cheaply that people could use as much as they wanted for free.

That was the AERE http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZETA_(fusion_reactor ) project, back in 1957.

Unless progress can go backwards from zero, it's kinda hard to see how it can go forwards any slower than the current rate.

Yes, it is unfortunate that Fusion was popularized well before it was feasible as "just around the corner". However, while progress is apparently slow, we have made significant progress over the years.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Back
Top