Is water a particle or a wave?

AI Thread Summary
Water is fundamentally a molecule (H2O), thus classified as a particle. It serves as a medium for wave transmission, such as when waves are created by throwing a rock into it. The discussion highlights that perception of water's behavior can vary based on the scale of reference: at a human level, it behaves like a wave, while at the atomic level, it is a particle. Below the molecular level, the relevance of water diminishes as the focus shifts to its constituent parts. Ultimately, the nature of water as a particle or wave is context-dependent, influenced by the scale of observation.
keihatsu
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Is water a particle or a wave?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
H2O is in fact a molecule (read: particle).
 
Water can act as a medium for transmitting waves (for example throwing a rock in the water produces waves), but it isn't a wave itself. In fact all matter can act as a medium for transmitting waves(sound can travel through air and even solids and liquids).
 
does this not depend on which scale of reference you're referring to? At our human level water is a wave (or at least behaves as one) at the atomic level water is a particle (h20) and at the super subatomic level water once again can be said to be a wave because the super strings or energy oscillations that theoretically make up the atoms of that molecule are waving energy oscillations.
 
Theheretic said:
does this not depend on which scale of reference you're referring to? At our human level water is a wave (or at least behaves as one) at the atomic level water is a particle (h20) and at the super subatomic level water once again can be said to be a wave because the super strings or energy oscillations that theoretically make up the atoms of that molecule are waving energy oscillations.

Anything below the molecular level is irrelevant to the question, because then you are no longer dealing with water itself, but its constituents.
 
DThielke said:
Anything below the molecular level is irrelevant to the question, because then you are no longer dealing with water itself, but its constituents.

yes but in regards to the thread starter's original question, the fact that he asked about particles/waves seems to imply that he MAY be interested in knowing what "water" is at its molecular level and below since it's pretty common knowledge that a molecule is not a 'wave' in and of itself but could perhaps be comprised of waves of oscillating energies at the far smaller level.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top