Is Water or Ice better for dissipating heat from a copper tube

In summary: you could then use a capillary tube finned heat exchanger designed for that application to cool your air.
  • #1
tilopa
8
0
I am running hot air through a copper tube that is inside a chest freezer. I would like to encase the copper tube in a coolant that will help cool the air in the tube and was wondering which of these 2 would work better, water mixed with antifreeze at a temperature of 0 degrees F, or Ice at 0 F?

Thanks.
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
A liquid will do much better than a granular solid.

For instance, immersing your hand in an ice slush will chill it much more rapidly than sticking it into a bin of ice cubes.

As another example, dry ice in acetone chills much better than dry ice alone.
 
  • #3
I assume you need a a supply of cold air for some purpose.
As jbriggs444 mentioned, to quote, a liquid will do much better than a granular solid.

Your choice on how to cool the air depends upon what flowrate of air required, and is it continious or intermitant?

You do realize that the antifreeze solution will increase in temperature as the hot ar transfers heat to it. If your flowrate of air is large enough you will after a passage of time not get air as cold as your requirements demand. You need to take into account whether or not the transfer of heat from the coolant enclosure to the chest freezer will be quick enough.

Have you thought of just adding a longer length of coiled tube within the chest freezer, or perhaps passing the air through a finned heat exchanger of suitable size.
 
  • #4
jbriggs444 said:
A liquid will do much better than a granular solid.

I am wondering why that is so. Solids have a higher Thermal Conductivity that liquids in general, ice has a TC of 2.1 and water is .5 something, my understanding is that means ice can transfer the heat from molecule to molecule much faster. Like Copper has a thermal conductivity of about 385, that is why it is so good at dissipating heat, no? The higher the TC the faster it can transfer heat. I am not merely concerned about how cold it feels on my skin because the ice and water in my example will be at the same temperature. Am I missing something here?

256bits said:
Your choice on how to cool the air depends upon what flowrate of air required, and is it continious or intermitant?

This will be a continuous operation, the air will flow through the copper at 3.2 Liters/sec. The coolant will be constantly cooled by the freezer which is plugged into the outlet.

256bits said:
Have you thought of just adding a longer length of coiled tube within the chest freezer, or perhaps passing the air through a finned heat exchanger of suitable size.

I am trying to determine how long the copper coil would need to be to cool the air in a continual operation. I am starting with 3 50 foot coils of 3/8 OD copper (about 1/4 inside diameter) but I am not sure that will be enough. Any thoughts on that?

Thanks.
 
  • #5
jbriggs444 said:
A liquid will do much better than a granular solid.

For instance, immersing your hand in an ice slush will chill it much more rapidly than sticking it into a bin of ice cubes.

BTW, the main reason your hand feels colder in your example is because more of the surface area of your hand is in contact with the coolant (ice slush) than with sticking it in ice cubes. I am talking about copper coils encased in a block of ice, so all of the surface area of the copper will be in contact with ice.
 
  • #6
tilopa said:
BTW, the main reason your hand feels colder in your example is because more of the surface area of your hand is in contact with the coolant (ice slush) than with sticking it in ice cubes. I am talking about copper coils encased in a block of ice, so all of the surface area of the copper will be in contact with ice.

that's exactly why a liquid will be better at cooling the air then a solid. surface area for thermal conductivity. better than a tube would be a capillary type finned heat exchanger, oil cooler etc.. the large surface area will increase the efficiency of heat conduction.

a block of ice will melt where the tube contacts it and then it'll have an air gap that would then insulate the tube and reduce the conductive thermal transfer as it's now being handled by still air.
 
  • #7
The freezer is already designed to cool air as that is the typical medium for heat transfer from stored food to refrigerant. You could dismantle the freezer to obtain the working parts, then direct your air through the evaporator. If you don't want to dismantle the freezer you could find the evaporator inlet and outlet. Run your inlet tube to the evaporator inlet and leave it open. Place the open end of your outlet tube either at the evaporator outlet or near the center of the freezer, away from walls which will conduct heat inward. As you pump air into the freezer it will be directly cooled by the freezers evaporator. Pressure in the freezer will build and begin pushing air out the outlet tube at the same rate that you are pushing it in.
 
  • #8
Thanks for all the info.

Mrspeedy, your idea sounds good, but it is a little bit involved for me right now, if my plan does not work I'll try your method. I've bought 50 feet of 3/8 copper refrigerator tubing, bent it into a coil and drilled holes at the top of the freezer and pushed the tubing through. I'm then going to full the freezer with 25% anti-freeze and 75% water and let it cool to as low as it will go in my freezer. Then pump air in through the copper and see how cool it comes out.
 

1. What is the difference between water and ice in terms of heat dissipation?

Water and ice both have the ability to absorb and dissipate heat, but they do so in different ways. Water is a better conductor of heat than ice, meaning it can absorb and transfer heat more efficiently. However, ice has a higher specific heat capacity, meaning it can absorb more heat energy per unit mass. This makes ice better for long-term heat dissipation, while water is better for quick cooling.

2. Which one is more effective in cooling a copper tube?

In general, water is more effective in cooling a copper tube than ice. This is because water has a higher thermal conductivity, meaning it can transfer heat more quickly. Additionally, water can be continuously circulated through the tube to maintain a consistent cooling effect, while ice will eventually melt and lose its cooling abilities.

3. Can ice cause damage to a copper tube?

Yes, ice can potentially cause damage to a copper tube if not used properly. If the ice is in direct contact with the tube, it can create uneven cooling and potentially cause the tube to crack or deform. It is important to use a barrier, such as a cloth or plastic wrap, between the ice and the tube to prevent direct contact.

4. Is there a specific scenario where ice would be better for dissipating heat from a copper tube?

Yes, there are certain scenarios where ice may be more effective in dissipating heat from a copper tube. For example, if the tube needs to be cooled for an extended period of time, such as in a refrigeration system, using ice may be more efficient as it has a higher specific heat capacity and can maintain a consistent cooling effect.

5. Are there any other factors to consider when choosing between water and ice for heat dissipation?

Yes, there are other factors to consider when choosing between water and ice for heat dissipation. These include the availability and cost of water and ice, the system in which the copper tube is being used, and the desired cooling rate. It is important to assess these factors and choose the option that best suits the specific situation and requirements.

Similar threads

  • Thermodynamics
Replies
2
Views
708
Replies
26
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
691
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
1
Views
642
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top