Is Weight Force an Apparent Force on a Rotating Plate?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether weight force is considered an apparent force on a rotating plate. It is established that in classical mechanics, weight is treated as a real force, while centrifugal force is an apparent force experienced by someone on the rotating plate. The conversation also touches on the concept of approximately inertial systems, clarifying that the Earth is considered approximately inertial due to its low rotation rate rather than the effects of gravity. Additionally, the impact of centrifugal force on the calibration of scales used for weighing is highlighted, emphasizing its significance in commerce. Overall, the participants reach a consensus on the treatment of forces in these contexts.
nebbione
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
Is the weight force an apparent force ? Sorry but on the web i can't find anything.
For example if i should think about a man that is on a rotating plate,what are the apparent force ?
I think surely the centrifugal force but should i consider even the wight force of the man ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nebbione said:
Is the weight force an apparent force ?
In General Relativity it is, in classical mechanics it is not.

For example if i should think about a man that is on a rotating plate,what are the apparent force ?
I think surely the centrifugal force but should i consider even the wight force of the man ?
As this is classical mechanics, you can (and should) treat gravitation as a real force.
 
Ok thank you very much!
Another question: so when we talk about approximately inertial systems like the earth, the Earth is said to be approximately inertial because it is rotating around the sun right ? and not because we feel the gravity, right =
 
Last edited:
nebbione said:
Ok thank you very much!
Another question: so when we talk about approximately inertial systems like the earth, the Earth is said to be approximately inertial because it is rotating around the sun right ? and not because we feel the gravity, right =

It is approximately inertial because the rotation rate of the Earth on its own axis is low. The centripetal acceleration associated with the rotation rate of the Earth (at the equator) is approximately 0.03 meters/sec^2.

If you are only quoting the acceleration of gravity to one or two significant figures, this deviation is insignificant.

If you are selling pork barbecue by the pound, this acceleration is significant. In order to be legal for use in commerce, a scale must accurately report the mass of the object being "weighed". Since a spring-based scale responds to apparent weight, this means that the calibration of the spring-based scale must reflect the centrifugal force resulting from the rotation of the Earth on its axis.
 
Thank you very much! Now i have no doubts!
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Average velocity as a weighted mean'

Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Similar threads

B Static friction needed for rolling without slipping
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Remark on centrifugal force in Heino Falcke's black hole book
Replies
22
Views
3K
I Torque required from powered roller to rotate cylinder
Replies
19
Views
2K
I Why does a free rigid body rotate only about its COM when F(ext) is applied?
Replies
7
Views
1K
Rotating frames - Apparent gravity
Replies
19
Views
2K
Motional EMF for loops of wire vs conducting plates
Replies
9
Views
2K
I Precession of a gyroscope in freefall
Replies
10
Views
3K
Having problem with centripetal and centrifugal force
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Translational force of a pulley
Replies
27
Views
2K
I Earth's angular velocity when axis is aligned with apparent gravity
Replies
1
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top