Is Work Dependent on Launch Angle?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of work done on a projectile landing at the same height from which it was launched. A 0.50-kg projectile is launched at an initial speed of 20 m/s at a 37-degree angle, resulting in a calculated kinetic energy of 100 J. The conclusion drawn is that since the launch and landing heights are equal, the angle of launch does not affect the work done upon landing, as energy conservation principles dictate that only the initial and final kinetic energies are relevant in this scenario.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, specifically kinetic and potential energy.
  • Familiarity with the work-energy theorem.
  • Knowledge of projectile motion and its parameters.
  • Ability to perform calculations involving energy conservation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the work-energy theorem in detail.
  • Learn about the conservation of mechanical energy in projectile motion.
  • Explore the effects of launch angles on projectile trajectories.
  • Investigate the role of air resistance in real-world projectile motion.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of energy conservation in projectile motion.

DmytriE
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Textbook problem:

A 0.50-kg projectile is given an initial speed of 20m/s at an angle of 37 degrees to a horizontal surface and lands a certain distance (range) from its launch point. How much work is done on the projectile on landing? (Neglect air resistance).

So the solution is -1.0 x 102 J

I found the kinetic energy using K=1/2mv2 substituting the known values in for the variables. Low and behold I got 100 J. Knowing that energy is conserved why is it that I did not have to take the angle at which the projectile was shot to find amount of work at landing?

My only explanation for it is that since energy is conserved the path by which it gets there is independent of the path taken. Is my thinking right or on the right track or am I in left field?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DmytriE said:
T
My only explanation for it is that since energy is conserved the path by which it gets there is independent of the path taken. Is my thinking right or on the right track or am I in left field?
The energy it gives up is its kinetic energy. Kinetic energy is not conserved. Kinetic + potential energy is conserved. But, so long as the potential energy at launch is the same as the potential energy on landing, the kinetic energy it gives up on landing will be the same as the kinetic energy at launch. This only works if the height of launch is the same as the height of landing.

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
This only works if the height of launch is the same as the height of landing.

AM

So since the landing place was at the same height as the launch the need to use the angle for calculations was unnecessary, correct?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K