Is Work Only Done When Energy Forms Change?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nicknaq
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
AI Thread Summary
Work is defined as occurring when energy forms change, but this statement can be ambiguous and context-dependent. Motion is necessary for work to be done, and energy conservation principles apply, particularly in frictionless scenarios where potential energy increases correspond to decreases in kinetic energy. The discussion highlights that less power is needed for slow lifting compared to fast lifting. The participants agree on the truth of the other statements, despite the ambiguity of the first. The textbook referenced is "Physics for Scientists and Engineers" by Serway and Jewett.
nicknaq
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Work is done when the form of energy changes.
Work cannot be done in the absence of motion.
Energy conservation law for a projectile (no friction): Potential energy increase equals the kinetic energy decrease.
Without friction, and in the absence of external forces, the sum of the potential and kinetic energies of a body is constant.
Energy is required to do work.
Less power is required while slowly lifting a box than while lifting it up quickly.
Problem Weight is: 1


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I thought they were all true except for the first one. But that isn't correct. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That first statement is a bit ambiguous:
nicknaq said:
Work is done when the form of energy changes.
Strictly speaking, this is equivalent to "If the form of energy changes, then work was done." Which is not true as a general statement, but depending on the context of your course may be considered true in some limited sense.

The other statements are less ambiguous and are true, so I suspect your book wants you to treat this as true as well.

What book are you using?
 
Doc Al said:
That first statement is a bit ambiguous:

Strictly speaking, this is equivalent to "If the form of energy changes, then work was done." Which is not true as a general statement, but depending on the context of your course may be considered true in some limited sense.

The other statements are less ambiguous and are true, so I suspect your book wants you to treat this as true as well.

What book are you using?

They're all true. Thank you for the help once again.
It's Physics for scientists and engineers
 
nicknaq said:
It's Physics for scientists and engineers
Who's the author? Fishbane, et. al.?
 
Doc Al said:
Who's the author? Fishbane, et. al.?

No, it is authored by Serway and Jewett.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top