Is Zero Torque on a Pivot Point Indicative of Zero Force?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sinister
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torques
AI Thread Summary
Zero torque at a pivot point does not necessarily indicate that the force acting on it is zero; rather, it suggests that the distance from the pivot to the point where the force is applied is zero. In scenarios where force is applied directly at the pivot, torque will be zero despite the presence of force. The relationship between torque and force is defined by the equation T = F x D, where D is the distance from the pivot. If the distance is small, the resulting torque will also be small, but this does not negate the existence of force. Understanding this relationship is crucial for analyzing torque in experiments involving pivot points.
Sinister
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


if the torque on a pivot point is zero does that mean the force acting on it is zero aswell?


Homework Equations


F = mg and T = F x D


The Attempt at a Solution



The sum of the torques in this lab that I'm doing isn't equaling zero... is this normal due to error?
I think it has something to do with the pivot point and the torques
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sinister said:

Homework Equations


F = mg and T = F x D

T=FD, so either F=0 or D=0. Most times, the distance of the force from the pivot is 0 i.e. the force is directly on the pivot.
 
Last edited:
ok but for the lab its asking us to measure the force along the pivot point using a scale... and we got a number so how does this affect the torque?
 
Sinister said:
ok but for the lab its asking us to measure the force along the pivot point using a scale... and we got a number so how does this affect the torque?

Well right, you might get a value for the force, but if the distance from the pivot is zero, then the torque is zero.

If the distance from the force is small, you will get a small value for the torque as well.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top